This evening, a group of team members were on the site, removing equipment from Area M.
As we left, the moon rose over the tell, as the sun was setting.
Here’s a nice picture of the moon over Area M:
Tom Elliott (firstname.lastname@example.org)
This feed aggregator is part of the Planet Atlantides constellation. Its current content is available in multiple webfeed formats, including Atom, RSS/RDF and RSS 1.0. The subscription list is also available in OPML and as a FOAF Roll. All content is assumed to be the intellectual property of the originators unless they indicate otherwise.
This evening, a group of team members were on the site, removing equipment from Area M.
As we left, the moon rose over the tell, as the sun was setting.
Here’s a nice picture of the moon over Area M:
Today we had some nice “extra-dig” activities for the team.
I first took them on a tour of Khirbet Qeiyafa, and then in the evening, our faunal expert, Ron Kehati, gave a workshop on the production of bone tools.
Here are some pictures:
So today was the final full day of digging for the 2019 season. As of tomorrow we start cleaning, photography and fold up. We had some nice finds today, particularly in Area M. This included a nice collection of loomweights, and a complete juglet (a large “black juglet”).
In Area D, we fully exposed one of the Iron IIA rooms. Quite cool to stand in a room from around 900 bce, with 2 m high plaster walls…
In Area Y, the brick and stone walls get bigger and bigger…
We also had quite a few visitors today. This included people from the IAA, the Nature and Parks Authority. We also had a group of IDF soldiers who helped out in Area M.
Dr. Ron Sha’ar (HU) and Yoav Vaknin (TAU) came again to the site to sample for archaeomagnetic studies, and found quite a few nice contexts for sampling.Overall – a great day!Here’s a few pictures:
It looks like the motif for the 2019 season at Tell es-Safi/Gath is:
“The awakening giant” – the massive early Iron Age city of Gath begins to surface!
This, I believe, will change a lot of what we know about southern Canaan in the early Iron Age.
Great end of the 3rd week. Next week is our final week, and we now know what will be our focus in the next two seasons, the last years of the current project at Tell es-Safi/Gath…
Here are two things that came out in pottery reading today, an early Iron Age jar handle with a thumb impression, and a nice little fragment of Cypriote White Painted pottery.
Funny we should have such finds, even though this is not a Judahite or a Canaanite site… :-)
P.S. And if you don’t understand what I’m referring to, you don’t…;-)
Nice and hot today (…), but we did have a great day! As I’ve already noted, perhaps the most interesting news is the ongoing discoveries related to the massive Iron I fortifications often lower city. More and more masonry and various finds relating to these enormous features are coming out in Areas B, K and Y. It looks like we will need another season or two to start getting a better understanding of what is going on! In any case, this clearly demonstrates that already in the late Iron I, and perhaps earlier as well, the Kingdom of Gath was very large, with a massively fortified capital city of ca. 500 dunam. So, all those who believed that Gath ascended to its central role only in the Iron IIA, may have to revise their views…:-)
Today was the last day for the CCU team, and they will be leaving early Friday morning. As always, they were a pivotal part of our team!
We had a few visitors today, including Prof. Yigal Erel (HU).
All told – a great day!
Fragments of a really nice Philistine 2 (Bichrome) Beer Jug (strainer spouted jug) with a very nice painted bird, just to the side of the spout, was read today in the pottery reading of Area D (Jeff’s team). The fragments came from the fills of the brick walled rooms near the gate. Very nice!
Today – we finished cleaning Area B2 for the final aerials later this evening. Also, we moved all of the material from the kibbutz to the Ariel lab where the team enjoyed looking over the finds from previous seasons.
Here are some pics from the day:
Another great day (even if a little hot…) on the tell!
The very cool news (not in the sense of temperature…) are the fascinating and very impressive remains coming out in all the areas.
In Areas K, B and Y, more and more extremely impressive architecture is appearing, of truly monumental size, at impressive depths. As of now, it appears that most of this dates to the Iron I, and we seem to have the making of some extraordinarily impressive features coming out in the eastern part of the lower tell. So much so, we are all making suggestions regarding possible functions (fortifications? gate? temple? public architecture? who knows…).
In Area D, additional aspects relating to the gate have appeared. On the one hand, we seem to understand this gate a bit more; on the other, things just get more complicated.
In Area M, more and more finds from the Hazael destruction are appearing. We took samples from sediments in the new round installation (possible olive press) – which hopefully will give us some idea of what this was used for!
We also had a few visitors today, including Baruch Brandl and Zvika Greenhut of the IAA, Ronen Hazan and Michael Klutstein (HU), and a news team from the Italian RAI channel.
As today was Argentina’s Independence Day, we flew an Argentinean flag for Flor!
Here are some pictures from today:
Another fun filled and find filled day at the tell! :-)
The areas in the eastern lower city (Y, K, B) are producing more and more impressive architecture – most (if not all) dating to the Iron I! This is starting to look really cool – more evidence of the massive nature of the lower city in the Iron I. It starting to look like we may be on the way to finding a truly monumental fortification in this area. Is this a gate? Is this a corner of the fortification? Are there other monumental features and structures here? Only time will tell – and it looks like we won’t have answers this season…there is a lot more to dig…
In Area M we have more of the Hazael destruction, including many more vessels, several loomweights, a jar stopper and other interesting things. Fun as always.
In Area D, more and more details of the gate are coming out. In addition, it appears that the window that we identified in one of the brick walls, near the gate, may in fact be turning into a door! Cool!
We also had quite a few visitors on site today, including Prof Ami Mazar (HU), Mr Shlomo Zohar (Chairman of the Board of Directors of BIU), and a group from the Ashkelon College, led by Dr. Ayelet Levi, herself formerly a Safi team member!
And BTW – was it hot today…:-)
Great news! The proceedings volume of the Ackerman Family Workshop in Biblical Archaeology, which was held at BIU in 2014, has appeared!
The volume is entitled:
Maeir, A. M., Itzhaq, S., and Mckinny, C. (eds.). 2019. The Late Bronze and Early Iron Age of Southern Canaan. Archaeology of the Biblical Worlds 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.It is part of the new series: Archaeology of the Biblical Worlds 2, which is put out by de Gruyter, as part of the Encyclopedia of Bible and Its Reception project.
The volume includes papers on various topics relating to the LB and early Iron Age of Canaan, some presented at the conference as well as a few invited ones (see here for the Table of Contents).
Check it out!
Today – we swept, swept, and swept some more. We also removed the shades from A1 and B2 and took all of the tools to the container. Jerry did a fantastic job reorganizing the container and now everything fits nicely inside!
Tomorrow – about half of the group will go to the tel to sweep and the other half will prepare the dig camp/office for closing off the season.
It has been a really great season and we are so thankful for all of our hardworking team and staff.
Personally, in my area – Area G – we had a fantastic group (Natasha, Shawn, Lauren, Jacob, Hyun, John, Kay, Wally, Nadine, Jeff, Christian, and anyone else that I may have forgotten and assistants (thanks Ian and Benjamin!)
Here are some photos of today’s work.
Today – we started the final week of the excavation and already we have begun to prepare for closing down the excavation.
A1 – Jane joined forces with the B3 crew (who closed down their area last week) and they made some nice progress exposing a wall with plaster in the Late Iron IIA destruction.
A2 – Debi and co. closed down the area for the season today and did a lot of sweeping!
B2 – Aharon got some new recruits this week from Ariel and A2 and they will continue to excavate tomorrow in a few places. It is now really clear that the outer fortification wall is floating and was probably not in place during the early Iron IIA destruction. Clay and others also continue to excavate inside of the fortification where we now have a nice stretch of the original casemate fortification.
G – We finished several small projects today exposing different parts of the area for the final aerial. Significantly! it seems that Shawn discovered one of the gate sockets! At this point, it is not clear if this relates to the 8th-7th century gate or an earlier gate. We will try and find out next year… stay tuned – now that we have one gate – why not one more
We were also visited by several people including Benjamin Foreman (The Master’s University), David Ben Shlomo and Michael Freikman (Ariel University) and John More (Bible Passages).
Benjamin Yang was interviewed by Good TV – a leading Christian news agency in Taiwan and China.
This afternoon – Itzick and I led a group from Tell es-Safi/Gath around the tel – as always it was great to catch up with our doktorvater (Aren Maeir), old friends and colleagues.
Great day on the dig today, with lots of finds and visitors on the site. Here are some shots from various areas. I hope to have a more detailed updated today or tomorrow.
Here’s a cool video (more than 8 minutes long) of the Safi team setting up the group photo.
Check it out!
Here is the 2019 group aerial shot, which we took at the end of the 2nd week (and we had close to 100 team members to make the image!).
We decided to make an image of a Philistine beer jug with a “basket handle” – viewed frontally towards to strainer spout. We also added “Gath” in Hebrew, and on the bottom, for clarity added its content (beer).
Here it is – enjoy!
So the 2nd week ended really nicely with nice finds in all areas. Last night, we had our end of week pizza party, a la 4th of July. We also said goodbye to quite a few team members that left at the end of the week. Today, in the field we had a bunch of nice finds.In Area D, Jeff and his team seem to have found an additional section of the city wall near the gate.In Area M, it looks like we have the road to the east of the main building, as well as quite a few vessels from the destruction within the building.In Area Y, Jill and her team are finding more and more architectural evidence, but still, we don’t fully understand what is going on.In Area B, Brent’s team are digging away. In one square they have a lot of architectural remains while in the other they are going deep, hoping to find the line of the Iron I wall that was found in Area K.In Area K, the main find today was an impressive continuation of the wall found in the deep square in the NE. This wall is quite a “monster”, and seems to be evidence of the impressive fortifications of the Iron I lower city.All told, a lot of really nice finds!We had a few visitors as well, including Aaron Burke and his team.Nice to finish the 1st half of the season, and rest on the weekend preparing for the 2nd half, with many more finds to go!Shabbat shalom to all!Here are some photos:
We ended week 3 with a nice flourish of finds and a cleaner picture of the stratigraphy in the different areas.
A1 – Jane, Andrew, and Keegan beautifully excavated a nice burnt building with an associated plaster wall. They also were able to collect several seeds below the outer fortification wall which might help provide a date for the fortification.
A2 – Debi and co. began to prepare the area for the end of the season. At this point, it is clear that they are through the 9th century layer – but the date of the next layer is unclear as they are finding a lot of Late Bronze and Early Iron IIA pottery. Next season – they will have to work through this to try and understand the complex stratigraphy of the earlier levels.
B2 – Aharon’s crew had a number of families visit and work in his area. They also made some nice breakthroughs. It seems likely that the outer fortification cuts through the Early Iron IIA destruction – which would mean that the fortification wall is later.
B3 – Marcella, Jerry, et al. closed down Area B3 – the area looks great and they have a lot of potential for next season.
G – We made some nice progress exposing the fortification and even have a small section of what seems to be a Persian surface. We also exposed several new walls that we are still trying to understand.
The weekend crew is in Jerusalem this weekend – starting off at Herodium.
We had a find filled day today, with some very nice things uncovered in various areas. In addition, we had a few visitors, including representatives of the Yoav Regional Council (led by the mayor, Dr. Mati Harkabi), and some archaeological colleagues including Stefan Munger, Eran Arie, and Alegre Savariego.
In Area K, we had quite a nice discovery – a massive wall, built of large stone, in a deep sounding on the northern side of the area. This most logically appears to be part of the fortification. The depth of this feature is quite surprising, more than a meter below the Iron IIA levels. Based on its orientation and sherds found near it, it probably dates to the Iron I! It appears then that the Iron I in the lower city of Tell es-Safi/Gath, is much more extensive – and impressive – than previously thought.
Similarly, in Area Y, several additional large walls were discovered, seemingly built up against the brick installations from this and last year. And, when we look at the overall plan that is beginning to appear, it looks like we have quite a large, and rather impressive, Iron I building this area! Once again, evidence of the impressive nature of the Iron I activity in the easternmost part of the lower city.
What can I say – this site never ceases to surprise!
In Area M, a second round stone installation, most probably another olive press was fully delineated. While we say this last year, we now have its full dimensions. In addition, additional wall, features and vessels were uncovered in the area.
In Area B, the team is digging deep down, trying to find the earlier phases of the city wall. We hope this will appear in the coming days.
In Area D, additional parts of the city wall, gate and 2 m high standing brick walls (and our window…) are being exposed. Things are looking great!
We did some aerial photography today, and we also made the annual group aerial photograph. I hope to post this in the coming days – I think it came out really nice!
See below some photos from today, with various views, team members and finds!
Wow! It was a fantastic day at the tel with a number of significant finds! Which was fitting since the good ‘ol USA celebrated its 243rd birthday!
We also had several visitors including Eran Arie, Stefan Munger, Alegre Savariego, and others.
A1 – Jane, Keegan, and Andrew uncovered a couple segments of a charred beam that seems to be related to the 9th century destruction.
A2 – Debi, Rebekah, Terry, etc. continue to work down into the Early Iron IIA destruction and several mudbrick features seem to have emerged. Oren and others took a chunk of the phytholiths for special analysis.
B2 – Debi (who did her PhD on textile production) leaped for joy when Teresa uncovered a very nice collection of loom weights in a burnt layer. It’s too soon to say if this should be related to the 9th or 8th century BCE. In this same area – Hannah found an almost complete black juglet (one of the first examples of this type at Burna). Things are becoming much more clear (but also more complicated as it usually goes) for Aharon, Sam, and Matt.
B3 – Marcella et al. finished removing the balk and now they have a very nice picture of the LB rooms with the associated finds.
G – We – along with the help of Jerry and Terry – removed what has to be the Burna record for the largest and heaviest stone! We also exposed more of the outer fortification wall and tower/buttress which is coming in very nicely. Ornali, John, and Shawn continued to work in the presumed drainage channel area. All told – most of the areas are in a good situation to end the season well.
This afternoon – Ladislav Smedja will be lecturing on the use of GIS in archaeology.
Here are some screenshots of the 3D photogrammetric models that we take/model every day of the excavation.
Things have been quite busy, so I’ll have to update for the last two days.
All areas are working well and finds are coming out. Yesterday, a large group of students from the annual BIU/YU science program joined us, and contributed very nicely in two of the areas. Here’s a quick review of the main finds:
Area B (formerly Area K2): Brent and his team are working away in the new area. In the southern square, some nice Iron Age architecture and contexts are coming out, although what exactly they are is not clear. In other, more northerly squares, they are digging up against the terrace that we assume is a reuse of the city wall, and so far, we don’t have clear cut answers. Hopefully, this will come out in the coming days.
In Area D, Jeff and his team are working away at the Water Gate area, with some really cool results. In addition to the 2 m high brick walls, one of which is plastered and has a window (!!!!), additional floors, elements and architectural features are popping out. Every day, we understand this complex area a little better. What we know for sure is that this gate looks like nothing we have ever seen before…
In Area K, Eric and his team are digging away, and are reaching clean Iron Age contexts and some architecture in just about all the squares. It’s starting to look like we may have the post-Hazael destruction “squatter phase” – which do far has only been identified in Area D!
In Area M, Maria and her team are deep into the Hazael destruction, and are expanding the area excavated last year. We may have found the road situated to the east of the building, as well as various other rooms and elements. Several more installations that seem to be related to olive oil production have appeared, as well as many, many vessels.
In Area Y, Jill and her team are working hard to try and understand the burnt brick installations and features, the crushed chalk concentrations, and various walls, some made of very large stones, that are found in this area. As in last year’s work, the finds fit in very nicely with the remote sensing results from 2017. That said, we still seem to be quite far away from truly understanding this area. That said, as opposed to last year, this year the Area Y team is finding much larger amount of pottery, once again clearly dating these features to the Iron I.
We also had a few visitors, including Oded Lipschits and David Vanderhooft.
All told great results in all areas. Notice all the various flags flying – representing various groups and nationalities on the dig!
Here are some pictures:
Today – a large group of kids from a Kefar Saba summer camp joined us in the field along with our friend and colleague Sylvie Yogev. They had a great time digging, sifting, and learning about archaeology. Community archaeology remains one of our long-term goals and methods for the project. As far as finds go – we had some nice progress in all of the different areas.
A1 – Jane and Andrew keep plugging along outside of the fortification finding more and more Iron IIA features.
A2 – Debi (and Hanoch who joined us today!), Terry, Rebekah, etc. are almost entirely in the Early Iron IIA. They uncovered a very nice complete storage jar that will undergo residue analysis (by Tsiona who joined us to excavate this).
B2 – Aharon and co. now have almost 3 meters(!) of the outer fortification wall exposed which is very impressive (and they still have not found the bottom).
B3 – Marcella et al. found several complete vessels and another lamp-bowl floor deposit along with a fragment of a plaque figurine – very nice finds!
G – Shawn, John, and Hyun reached the surface of the 9th century layer – they did a great job moving something like 50 cm in three days! Hyun also found one of our only examples of a Cypriot Black-on-Res juglet. Natasha, Benjamin, Ian, Jacob, and Yael continued to work on the outer fortifications which are still not completely clear yet. However, it now seems that we have a massive tower projecting from the outer fortification wall. Lauren worked very hard to expose the inner part of the outer fortification. Ornali, Shawn, and John continued work on the very nice drainage channel that runs below the gate.
Yesterday afternoon – Debi gave a great talk and workshop on textiles and weaving (with lots of items to play around with This afternoon – I will be giving a lecture on the Judean Shephelah during the Iron Age.
It was another nice day in the field – the visibility was really exceptional. We could see four of the five Philistine cities from the summit and much of the Shephelah and hills around Hebron.
A1 – Jane, Andrew, and Keegan continue to work through more and more layers of the Iron IIA.
A2 – Debi, Rebekah, Terry, Micheala, Sophia, etc. confined to excavate in an Iron IIA layer below the silos. The phytholith layer is also quite extensive. Micheala also found a Philistine Monochrome (aka Mycenaean IIIC/Philistine 1) sherd – a rarity at Burna thus far.
B2 – Aharon and co. with the help of the wall/large rock removal squad (Jerry & Terry Inc. removed the remaining 7th cent. wall and exposed the earlier wall that seems to relate to the inner part of the casemate. They also continued to work in the destruction outside of the fortification.
B3 – Marcella, Reilly, Micheala, and Jerry have already a nice segment of a bedrock surface in the new square and also what appears to be a “lamp-bowl” deposit. The above-mentioned squad also removed three enormous boulders from the other square – now we can really see the wall.
G – In my area, Shawn, Hyun, and John continue to get deeper into the Late Iron IIA layer and it is looking more and more like this layer was destroyed by fire. Hopefully tomorrow we will reach the surface. Ornali (long-time dig team member!), Guy, and Reina worked in a square we opened last season and it seems that we may have a very nice water channel that runs beneath the gate of the fortress. Natasha, Ian, Yael, Lauren, and Jacob worked hard at exposing a large collapse near the outer fortification and we might finally have an idea about its orientation. Benjamin has exposed a very high segment of the massive city wall that will be very impressive to see in the final photos.
This evening – Debi will be giving a lecture on textile production in the Iron Age.
The weekenders had a great time in Tiberias visiting a number of sites along the coast, Galilee, and the Golan Heights.
Yesterday afternoon – the whole team enjoyed a tour of the interesting nearby site of Khirbet al-Rai (also known as Arai) led by directors Yossi Garfinkel, Kyle Keimer, and Saar Ganor.
Today – we began the third week of excavations – which means that we are in the final 6 or 7 field days of work. We had some very nice progress in all of the areas.
A1 – Jane’s team is now consisting of Keegan and Andrew. Happy Canada day! to these two and their other fellow Canadiens (and since we continue to have a running debate on the tel – we all know who really won the War of 1812 :). They have excavated through what appears to be several striations of Iron IIA surfaces mostly related to the Late Iron IIA but they are beginning to get more and more sherds from the Early Iron IIA. They also seem to have reached below the outer fortification wall on the outside – which is a nice accomplishment as we had yet to do this in the ten years since we began the project. Now we need to get to the bottom of the wall from the inside (which will date its initial construction.
A2 – Alas! The two silos – anthropomorphized as “baby silo” and “mama silo” are no more. The A2 team took them out today and have a lot of ash and mudbrick debris – it will be interesting to see if this destruction(?) relates to the same 10th century destruction in B2. Terry’s side of A2 also came down on a series of phytholith layers that will hopefully be examined by specialists in the next few days.
B2 – Aharon’s team continues to expose the outside of the fortification digging through Late Bronze metallurgical fill and what seems to be the top of an Early Iron IIA destruction.
B3 – Marcella and co. opened a new square a couple of days ago – they have already reached bedrock (a few cm below surface) and some nice architecture from the LB.
G – We are focusing our attention on a section just inside the casemate fortifications and on two squares directly on a massive lower fortification. In the upper part, it now seems that we have dug lower than the inner casemate, which apparently in this section was only in use during the Iron IIB(?) and IIC – as we now have a lower level (dug by Shawn, John, and Hyun) that seems to date to the Late Iron IIA (but we will have to look closely at the pottery…) In the lower part – Ian, Natasha, Yael, Jacob, and Benjamin are digging through what appears to be a large collapse of a wall but the collapse is making it difficult to excavate. Tomorrow – we plan to dismantle the collapse and hopefully make more sense of the massive fortification in this area.
This evening – Michal Hejman presented on soil analysis using Handheld XRF at many different sites.
Today (Monday, July 1st) was the first day of excavations of the 2nd week of the 2019 season. It appears that are first week sufficiently scared the remains in all the areas, since today, all areas had great new finds! If last week we had some finds, here and there, as of today, all the areas are popping! Finally, everyone has substantial archaeological contexts and architectural remains, including in the completely new squares that were just opened last week. Way to go.
Area D had the most fantastic results today. The most astonishing thing was a two meter high brick wall, with a plaster coating, and in it, the beginning of exposure of a window, door or niche! This is one of the fully standing brick walls dating to ca. 900 BCE! These walls were rooms that were filled in just before the Hazael destruction (to bolster the fortifications in this area) and these fills protected the walls made out of sun dried mudbricks. I’ve rarely seen such well preserved mudbricks in ancient Levantine sites. Very cool!
The Area M team is beginning to get the Hazael destruction in the 3 new squares to the east, and hints to a road (that appeared in the remote sensing) seem to be appearing as well.
In Area K, the new squares to the north are beginning to produce a lot of very nice architecture of clear stratified contexts – and it looks like we are on clean contexts. This, hopefully will reach up to the city wall just to the north – and provide some dating of the wall.
In Area B (formally K2, just renamed, as it’s Brent’s area…), a really nice wall and associated features fully appeared today, and it looks like there is good preservation in this area as well. Here too, we hope that we will be able to connect this to the city wall that is just to the north.
In Area Y, all square are producing really nice architecture, features and contexts. There is another burnt brick installation, similar to the one we found last year, and whole series of impressive wall and other features appearing. Hopefully, this will help us make more sense of the many enigmatic aspects that we uncovered in this area last year.
All told – a great beginning for the 2nd week – and a sign for all the great finds that will appear in the coming days and weeks!
Here’s some pictures from today. Note that plastered brick wall with the window/door/niche with Will Krieger right next to it; the Canadian flag flying in honor Canada Day; and all various team members in the various areas!
We have officially reached the halfway point of the season. Thus far, we have already met a number of our goals and hope to end the season strong!
Since about half of the team went with me to Galilee (see pics), Areas G and B3 dug in B2 and A2 where they made a nice push to move “some dirt”
We had a great second week and we are sorry to see Andy, Stahlie, and Daniel go – hope to see you next year
Here are some photos of today’s excavation and the Galilee field tour (Caesarea, Mount Carmel, and Megiddo). Note – the new visitor’s center at Caesarea is fantastic! Tomorrow we had to the Hulah Valley and Golan Heights.
The dig is running like a well-oiled machine all five areas are making progress, answering major (and minor) stratigraphic questions, and – most importantly – having a lot of fun.
A1 – Jane, Scott, Andrew, and Keegan are excavating outside of the outer casemate fortification in two interesting contexts. In the lower square – they continue to reveal a very nice assemblage that is well-dated to the 9th century BCE. Interestingly, in the upper square it seems that we have finally reached the bottom of the outer fortification wall (and it only took ten years We will find out more soon…
A2 – Debi and co. exposed the floor of a “baby silo” which is close to a much larger silo – both of which seem to date to the Iron IIB.
B2 – Sam and Stahlie moved a lot of dirt next to the outer fortification wall and several students from Ariel University did the same in another square. It seems that we are on top of the early Iron IIA destruction in these squares. This morning the team all helped remove a wall in B2 and now it seems that there may be a couple of Iron IIC/7th cent. BCE phases there.
B3 – Marcella, Jerry, Micheala, and Reilly are uncovering more and more LB pottery including a number of nice Cypriot imports. Today – they opened a new square – and as usual in the lower plateau – they immediately reached the LB. This new square looks very promising as the architecture seems to be very well built (unlike in other parts of the plateau).
G – my area made some nice progress today. We seem to have reached an 8th century BCE layer inside of the casemate wall that is contemporary with the layer exposed in A2 in previous seasons. We also now have a very large and well built (outer?) fortification wall that is very interesting.
This afternoon – Andrea and Tina are lecturing on Archaeobotany and Zooarchaeology respectively.
Beginning tomorrow – I will be leading about half of the team on a field tour of various places Galilee for three days.
We’re about to finish the 1st week of excavations (one more day) and things are looking really nice!
The IAA excavation came to an end today, with some really nice results. In association with the thick walls of what appears to be a public building, there was a great assemblage of pottery, including several bowls (some stacked on in the other), cooking jugs (one fallen over from a nearby ring stand), juglets and other vessels. Clearly, this is just part of the finds from this very interesting building. At the end of the day (and the short dig), the square was covered over. Hopefully, we’ll return to this, and expand it, in a coming season! Thanks to Svetlana from the IAA who supervised the excavation!
Here are some pictures from the IAA dig:
In our areas, we had some nice results as well!
In Area M, the finds are popping out, including more vessels and a collection of loomweights. In the new squares we are reaching the destruction as well!
In Area K2 – more and more architecture is beginning to appear, and it looks like there is good preservation!
In Area K – a very large wall with a stone foundation has appeared, and possible brick walls are to be seen as well.
In Area Y – all the squares are beginning to show finds, fitting in very nicely with the picture from the remote sensing. In addition, we had a visit from Ron Shaar and Yoav Vaknin (HU), Ruthy Shahack-Gross (Haifa) and Oren Ackerman (Ariel), to discuss and suggest analyses to understand the burnt brick features and chalk deposits that we started to uncover last year, and continue this. Hopefully, this will develop further in the future.
In Area D, in addition to uncovering more parts of the fortifications, they had a very nice alabaster bead.
After spending some time in Area Y, Yoav Vaknin went on to take samples for archaeomagnetic analyses, from a tabun in the IAA excavations (see picture) and from the burnt features in Area M.
And here is the daily clip!
We continued to make a lot of progress in all of the areas.
A1 – Jane, Keegan, Andrew, and Scott are nearly finished removing the ten-year old balk and continue to find restorable 9th century BCE remains.
A2 – Debi’s team has exposed more and more of the layers below the 9th-8th century BCE building and are beginning to find a layer characterized by the early Iron IIA (10th cent. BCE). The pottery and probably the layer is contemporary with the destruction that we found down in B2. We will have to wait and see if we have the same destruction in A2 as well.
B2 – More ball removal and lots of restorable pottery from the 10th century destruction. Andy and Matt also continued to expose the late Iron II building close to the fortification.
G – Great progress today. We now very clearly have another section of the massive fortification wall thanks to Benjamin and Jacob’s meticulous work. Hailey, Gai and Gabriel, Ian, and others worked on removing the top soil for a new square that we think has a lot of potential for answering some of or major architectural questions. Natasha and Hyun removed a balk to help us better understand the architecture. Shawn and Lauren continued to expose the inside of the casemate wall – we now hope to go as far down as possible this season to get the earliest date of the inner fortification wall. Christian dismantled a rebuild between two very massive boulders. Interestingly, the fill seems to date to the Persian period – which might mean that we have now found “a” gate or at least an entrance to the city during the Iron IIC and perhaps earlier. It is to soon to tell, but if it is the gatehouse it would be similar to the simple one found at Tel Arad.
This evening – Marcella will be lecturing on different features of the Late Bronze Shephelah.
Also – see the pic below that shows Debi getting her PhD diploma! Way to go!
Great day in the field today, with lots of new and interesting finds! It was a scorcher today (around 35 degrees C), but it looks like we all made it!
Jeff and his team in Area D East are working on revealing a long section of the city wall next to the gate, and various rooms that are adjacent to it. It’s looking very impressive!
In the IAA excavation on the other side of the parking lot from Area D East, they also have some great finds, including some very impressive architecture (I would say it looks like a public building), two phases of Iron IIA (not common on the tell) and a nice amount of nice restorable pottery. We took one of the jugs for analyis – and perhaps will get an idea about its contents in the future.
In Area M, Maria and her team are, as usual, starting to find a lot of finds, both in the old squares and in the new ones. This includes several vessels (including a complete chalice), loomweights, beads, and a lot of very nice architecture.
In Area Y, Jill and her team are working away! They’ve fully opened the 3 new squares and another of the “hotspots” that appeared in the magnetometry is beginning to appear. Hopefully, this, along with a fresh analysis of the ones from last year, will enable us to understand what exactly was the function of these features.
In Area K2, Brent and the Aussies are working in the squares near the city wall, and appear to come on to some very impressive architecture, with associated pottery. This is important, as it indicates that the preservation in this area is good!
In Area K, Eric and his team had a couple of cool finds today. The first was a very well-preserved scarab (dating to the Ramesside period by Prof. S. Muenger), and small piece of a bimetallic knife, very typical of the Philistine culture. They both were found very close to surface, in a concentrations of stones, perhaps part of some architectural feature.
In addition, we tried out for the first time on site the new handheld LIDAR scanner that we recently purchased. Noam scanned Area M and part of Area Y, and we’ll if can get nice results from this! You can see a shot of Noam working with the scanner in the clip below.
Very nice day!
Here’s the daily clip:
The weather was slightly warmer today than it has been – but we pressed on!
A1 – Jane, Keegan and Scott are continuing to expose more and more of the outer Iron Age fortification wall and coming down on some new architecture and also what appears to be some complete vessels.
A2 – Debi’s team continue to progress through the silo, pit, and other surrounding complicated architecture.
B2 – Aharon, Stahlie, Matt, Sam, Clay, Andy, Sarah, and Hannah worked in what seems to be an Iron IIC building (now pretty well dated) next to the wall and also removing the balk above the very nice Early Iron IIA destruction excavated the last to seasons.
B3 – Marcella’s team continues to find more and more pottery and some very odd and not very straight Late Bronze architecture.
G – Lauren, Hailey, and Shawn came down on a very nice layer that seems to be a pavement connected with the inner casemate wall. This layer either dates to the Iron IIB or IIC – but we don’t know yet. Lauren found a very nice upper millstone on the floor. Since we are clearly on the fortifications we took the opportunity to reenact Abimelech’s fateful siege of Thebez in which he was struck in the head by an upper millstone thrown by a lady defending her city. Lauren played the part of the heroic defender. Christian played Abimelech and Jacob acted as the unnamed armor bearer who put Abimelech out of his misery (Judg 9:50-57). This was fun
This morning – myself, Terry, Matt, Ladislav, Michael and Daniel went to nearby Khirbet ‘Atr (biblical Ether) as we noticed that the site was recently burned and the architecture was very visible on the surface. Terry took a number of drone photos that we hope to develop into a photogrammetric 3D model of the site.
This afternoon – the team went over to nearby Tell es-Safi/Gath where Prof. Aren Maeir gave us a fascinating tour of the lower city and what they have been uncovering there the last decade or so.
Today, the 2nd day in the field, all the teams were fully excavating and finds began to pop up!
In Area D, Jeff and his team started working in various squares in the vicinity of the gate. As will be detailed as we go along, they are trying to understand the dating, phasing and function of the fortification, walls and rooms built up against this area. Things are looking good!
Area K: Eric and his team opened up a series of squares to the north of the squares that had been excavated in previous seasons, hoping to eventually connect to the very impressive wall line, most probably originally a fortification wall, that is just to the north. As we move along the season, we hope to be able to begin to understand this wall, its dating and phases, and its relationship to the adjacent features in Area K.
Area K2: Brent and his team opened up 3 new squares adjacent to an additional section of this same wall (from Area K), once again with the aim of understanding the wall, its dating and phasing and relationship to other features. One of the interesting questions in Area K2 is whether there will be Iron I features on surface (as in nearby Area Y – see below), or Iron IIA features as in nearby Area K. Time will tell!
Area Y: Just to the south of Area K2, Jill and her team opened up three new squares to the north and north west of last year’s squares, in an attempt to find more parts of the very interesting burnt features that were found last year (and had appeared in the magnetometry as well). Lots of questions that we don’t have answered about these features, so this should be very interesting!
Area M: Maria and her team continued working in some of the squares from last year, as well as opened a few new ones, to better understand the architecture and various features that were discovered last year, and to try and get to additional features, such as a road, seen in the magnetometry. And lo and behold, the team found some very nice looking walls, and what seems to be a restorable vessel. So we should have lots more of great finds from here!
In addition, the IAA team continued excavating near the parking lot, and a couple of more vessels came out. It seems that not only is there an Iron IIA level, they are exposing an earlier level, most probably from the early Iron IIA or late Iron I.
And here’s the daily clip:
The 2019 season is off to a great start. Yesterday, the team gathered at Kfar Menahem, and it looks like we have a great team (just under 100 for week 1 and 2).
So today (Monday, June 23, 2019) was the first day in the field of the 2019 season. And yes, it was hot and the team spent most of the day cleaning, fixing up shades and areas, and all kinds of not-that-fun activities, but – by the end of the day, all five areas were ready. And tomorrow, early in the morning, we will have five fully function areas starting to dig! What a team!!
In addition, we have some guests on site for the first week. A team from the Israel Antiquities Authority is excavating a square just to the south of Area D (near the main parking lot of the site) and already after two days, have found some very impressive architecture, and some very nice finds (including an almost complete strainer bowl), all from the Iron IIA (Hazael) destruction. So, we now have another point on the map of the impressive character of the Iron Age lower city. In fact, their finds looks so nice, I’m considering extending this area next year, and opening some more squares around it!
And in addition to it all, yesterday we had a field trip to visit the upper tell at Tell es-Safi/Gath, and today, some of the team went for a visit to nearby Tel Azekah.
Things are looking good!
And here is the daily clip
Myself and the weekend tourers had a great time in the Dead Sea and Negev regions touring a number of sites. The best part was the weather was pretty mild for this time of year. Here are some photos from our travels.
Today – we embarked on week 2 – which along with week 3 – are the main periods of progress for a four-week excavation season.
In A1 – Jane, Andrew, Scott, and Keegan made excellent progress today along the outer fortification wall. They had lots of restorable pottery from the late Iron IIA and it also seems that they have at least one either complete or (at least) restorable large jar.
In A2 – Debi, Terry, Rebekah, and co. are continuing to work in and around an 8th century BCE silo and a Persian pit. They have also continued to remove the floor of the Iron IIA/B (we are still trying to date it…) building. Very interestingly, it seems that we are getting down to an Iron IIA layer (whether or 10th or 9th we are not sure yet). Even more interesting, much of the pottery coming out of this layer has lots of Late Bronze sherds which might indicate that there is a strong presence of the LB on the main tell itself directly beneath the Iron IIA layers – a situation that would parallel nearby Lachish.
B2 – lots of different layers are being excavated. Clay and Sarah are exposing a room of a building that was likely used in the Iron IIC. Stahlie and Sam were taking down the “Balk of Death” above the fantastic early Iron IIA destruction. They have also reached this same destruction directly outside the fortification wall. It now seems really clear that the west side of the site (Area B2) does not have an extramural Late Iron IIA phase as we saw in Area A1.
B3 – Marcella, Jerry, Michaela, and Reilly continue to find loads of LB pottery – today in the reading we had several very nice fragments from Cyprus including Base Ring and White Slip. In addition, there was also a large fragment of an LB krater with a very nice scene of a palm tree and what appears to be either a fish or a bird in the typical LB Canaanite decorative style.
G – The search for the gate continues… Shawn, Lauren, and Ian plowed through 20 cm today and reached what appears to be either an Iron IIB or Iron IIC surface inside of the casemate wall. Christian, Hyun Hwak Kim, and Natasha exposes a later surface (Persian?) along what seems to be part of the fortifications. Jacob and Benjamin are articulating the top of what appears to be a truly massive solid wall which might be a major clue for locating the gate…
It was a great first week with lots of progress in all of the areas. We still have a good sized group next week. We had to say goodbye to new friends from North Carolina (and others). Thanks for all your hard work! As usual – Friday was also family day and several family groups joined us for part of the excavation day
A1 – It is very clear that Jane’s team is on the same level that was excavated previously and a number of Iron IIA sherds are popping up. They also found a very nice pyxis fragment.
A2 – Debi, Terry, Rebekah, etc. continued to remove the iron II(B? or perhaps late IIA) floor to define the earlier layers. The last two days they have begun to notice a large deposit of burnt mudbrick or roof debris that has quite a lot of ash. We hope that this will turn out to be a destruction layer from an earlier Iron Age phase but we will have to wait and see.
B2 – Aharon, Matt, Sam, Clay, etc. began removing a massive balk above the destruction layer from the Early Iron IIA and they also continued to expose the late Iron II building east of the fortifications. Just outside of the fortifications – it seems that they are beginning to teach a destruction layer – but since they are the slope – we do not yet know if this relates to the 10th century destruction or later.
B3 – Marcella, Jerry, Michaela, Reilly, etc. had some very nice finds today including a Late Bronze chalice and a few other restorable vessels.
G – Despite the short day – we had some nice progress in Area G. We uncovered more courses to the walls that we discovered earlier this week. Benjamin and Jacob began uncovering what appears to be a huge section of the fortification wall, which might give us some hints as to where the gate might be located.
This weekend – several members of the team will be heading to Jerusalem. I am leading a groups to the Dead Sea and Negev where we will visit a number of sites over the weekend including Khirbet Qumran, Ein Gedi, Masada, Arad, and Tel Sheva.
Finally – on a somewhat related regional issue – I received word that my paper dealing with the locations of Lehi, Ramath-Lehi, etc. in the Samson narrative was published in the Journal of Archaeology and Text – see here.
And here are a bunch of pics taken by various members of the team!
Yesterday afternoon I led some of the team on a tour of Azekah. Also, Matt gave a very interesting lecture on Iron Age tombs discussing various issues related to the archaeology, ancient inscriptions, and the biblical text.
A1 – Jane’s team has done a very nice job cleaning the old excavation squares and it seems that they are beginning to excavate the Late Iron IIA phase found in previous seasons.
A2 – there are a number of interesting features coming up all over the area as Debi, Rebekah, Terry, etc. continue to remove the floor of the Iron II building. In the pottery reading today we had several very nice examples of late Iron IIA bowls.
B2 – Aharon – who receives his diploma tonight for his PhD (way to go Aharon!!!) – continued to excavate in the new square which seems to be related to the Iron IIC building that was built on top of the earlier Iron II fortifications. Clay and Sam also began dismantling a very large and (now) very fragmentary balk above the destruction layer. Hopefully, next week they will begin excavating the Early Iron IIA destruction.
B3 – Marcella has some very large architecture that is built in the typical (crummy and not very straight) Canaanite, Late Bronze tradition. They also uncovered a lot of pottery including a few pieces of Cypriot ware.
G – We have exposed several new walls including what seems to be the casemate fortification seen in other areas. However, the orientation and the size of the walls around these walls are different and seem to be quite massive. It also appears – as of now – that we have several phases of activity in this area from at least the Iron IIB through the Persian period. We had a very worn two-winged LMLK seal impression (the part where the city could be [e.g., Socoh] is broken) come up in pottery reading today.
Tomorrow – we have a slightly shorter day as the team goes to different parts of the country on the weekends.
Today, a group of team members were on the tell, preparing the various areas for the excavation. We had a tractor with us, which did a fantastic job removing thorns and cacti from around the various areas, fixing up soil dumps, and in general, making the excavation areas and surroundings into a much more easier to manage environment.
The areas are looking good – and it looks like we are going to have a really great season.
And we even had a nice find today – a very large olive oil press stone, found in a terrace near Area K.
Things are looking good.
Tomorrow, a bunch of the team will be at BIU and Kfar Menahem, setting up equipment for the dig.
And the rest of the team arrives on Sunday! Dig fever is definitely here!!
It was another good day in the field with several nice finds.
A1 – Jane’s team dug through a massive balk collapse and is seeing the first signs of the Iron IIA destruction that we excavated previously.
A2 – Debi and team have made a lot of progress removing the floor of the Iron II building and excavating a Persian pit and Iron II silo. In the silo, Erika found a very, very nice head of a Judean Pillared Figurine. We have found several of these in previous seasons – but this one is very ornate and has several different colors decorating the face, hair, and neck. We can’t wait to see what it looks like after it is cleaned.
B2 – Work is progressing with the new square – coming down on the beginning of the Iron Age levels. Also, Aharon’s crew is excavating in a couple places just outside the fortification wall (outer fortification), which is preserved to a very impressive height.
B3 – Marcella’s team continued to expose the architecture that I mentioned yesterday.
G – Christian, Natasha, and Hyun exposed a nice segment of what appears to be part of the fortification wall – we also have this already in the other new square. This morning, our team worked on clearing a wide area to see the architecture on the surface of the tell. It seems that we have some very large walls sloping down the tell that we hope to expose later this week or the beginning of next week. While we don’t have the gate yet – for sure – it still looks promising…
All areas were up and running today… with shade! We certainly cannot complain about the weather which has been cooler than it can be… Work progressed in all five areas.
A1 – Area A1 is on the east side of the tell running down the eastern Iron II fortifications. Jane and co. opened up an old square that has not been excavated since 2010. In fact, the last time it was excavated my wife (Mindy) and myself (and others) excavated what seemed to be a nice, possible 9th century BCE destruction layer. The destruction was certainly a long time ago, but our excavations also seem like a distant memory The main goal for A1 is to locate this Iron IIA layer, excavate it, and perhaps dig below it to an earlier layer. By doing this, we hope to determine the chronological relationship between this possible destruction layer in A1 and the certain Early Iron IIA (10th century BCE) destruction layer found in Area B2 in previous seasons.
A2 – Area A2 is located in the northern part of the summit of the tell and is a familiar sight for those who have visited the tell or followed the blog. Debi’s team plans to continue to excavate below the very large Iron IIB building to reveal earlier layers (9th and 10th centuries?). However, they must also contend with a couple pits that were cut into the middle of the squares by those pesky Persians…
B2 – Area B2 is a 10-meter wide section running east to west on the western slopes of the tell. Aharon has been excavating in this area over the last few seasons and several very important features have begun to emerge. First, the casemate fortification wall which was in use from at least the 9th through the late 8th century BCE. Inside this fortification is a nice building (Four room house?) that seems to be incorporated into the casemate wall. We have excavated much of this building in previous seasons – and we will continue to expand in a new square while also excavating below the structure into the earlier Iron Age levels. In so doing, we hope to finally establish the initial construction date of the fortification wall. Besides that, we also plan to continue excavating the massive Early Iron IIA destruction layer that we have been uncovering the last two seasons. While looking at the section today, Aharon commented on how the winter rains revealed in the balk clear evidence of two stories (of a building) filled with destruction debris. Sam, Matt, Clay, Stahlie, Hannah, and others will be back in this destruction layer very soon….
B3 – Area B3 is a new/old area. Marcella opened this area just south of Area B1 – the large cultic Late Bronze enclosure that I excavated in previous seasons. In our past work, we noted a concentration of large stones (now known as Area B3) could be a new building to the south of the large enclosure or the elusive southern wall of the enclosure. So far, and after only one day, it seems that Marcella along with Mikayla, Reilly, Jerry, and others have some very nice architecture and Late Bronze pottery.
G – Area G was opened last season in hopes of finding the gate of the Iron Age fortifications. Last season, my crew exposed a lot of massive architecture but without very much pottery. This season, we opened two new squares to the west and also plan to open a couple more and continue excavating in a few of the squares that we opened last season. Today, we exposed a nice stretch of the fortification which may be casemate (two parallel walls) in form or perhaps a massive solid wall – we will find out more tomorrow. Significantly, Shawn found a large fragment of a horse and rider figurine – which is a common cultic item from the Iron IIB-C. This is a very nice find – and a great way to begin the excavations in G – now we only need to find the place where the actual horses with their riders came in and out of the site For a similar complete example of this type – see here.
We had a great first day with groups from North Carolina, the University of Saskatchewan, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Texas A&M University Corpus Christi, the local junior high students from Kiryat Gat (as part of our long-time community archaeology project) and others.
As it was the first day – we made many trips to the container and worked on removing the weeds (which are enormous this year thanks to the abundant rain this winter). In any case, we managed to get most of the shades up over all five areas (A1, A2, B2, B3, and G) and also began excavating in most of the areas. We still have a lot of winter wash and “weeding” to do, but we were happy to break ground on a few news squares as well as return to some old ones.
This afternoon we had our first field tour – myself and Matt led a tour of Beth Shemesh and its past excavations. Then, Aharon took us across the (very busy) street to the new salvage excavations that have revealed a number of interesting features including a very large, well-preserved (and previously unknown) 7th century BCE city, some very nice Hellenistic and Early Roman remains (e.g., a very large public mikveh), as well as other structures from later periods.
Here are a few photos from the day.
So it’s just one week before the beginning of the 2010 season, and it’s a great opportunity to present some of the objectives (not all…) for this season.
As in the previous season, we will be excavating in several areas in the lower city, that is the relatively flat part of the site, to the north of the tell and up to the Elah Valley Riverbed. There will be several areas:
Area D East (directed by Jeff Chadwick): we will continue excavating in the gate area, attempting to better define the gate and its various phases, and understand the various features, rooms and other aspects in its vicinity.
Area K (directed by Eric Welch): after a one year break, Eric will be back in Area K, and will be expanding the area to the north, to try and connect the previously excavated features with the large wall just above the riverbed. We hope to try and understand that this is, how it relates to the features in Area K, and perhaps, get a good date for the activity in this area.
Area K2 (directed by Brent Davis): This area is also renewing work after a one year break. In the 2017 season, we excavated a portion of the monumental, multi-phased wall situated on the slope going down towards the river bed, just to the west of Area K. Previously, we excavated Iron IIA levels within this wall. This year, we will try and reach the top of this wall from inside the city, and try and see if there are elements that are built up against it.
Area Y (directed by Jill Katz): Continuing last year’s work, where some very interesting Iron I (not Iron IIA!) features were found, including what appears to be a brick kiln and an installation for the production of a plaster like chalk material. We intend to expand the area, particularly to the north and east, hoping to further understand these features, their function and date – and how they relate to other finds in the lower city.
Arean M (directed by Maria Eniukhina): last year we excavated 4 squares chock-full of finds from the 9th cent BCE destruction level (wrought by Hazael). This year, we continue and expand in this area, in an attempt to further understand the phasing and architecture, and perhaps to uncover more rooms and possible alleyway, which was discerned in the remote sensing (by Andy Creekmore).
These are some of the objectives in the various areas, along with some others that we are thinking of – and those that will undoubtedly pop up as we start excavating.
And, as always, we are hoping from some truly astounding finds! (I wouldn’t mind an inscription, by Hazael, telling us about his conquest of Gath…:-).
I’m getting excited…
We are happy to announce that Marcella Barbosa received a 2019 ASOR Eric & Carol Meyers Fellowship to dig (again!) at Tel Burna.
Tomorrow – the team will descend to Kibbutz Netiv HaLamed Heh and then begin setup for Week 1 by moving equipment from the container to the tell. We are very excited to see what is in store for us this season!
As you may already know, you can’t excavate without a good season t-shirt (:-), so here’s a sneak preview of the back of the shirt!
Team members will receive their shirts when they arrive at the dig, and the various sizes and colors that were ordered will be available!
The 2019 season at Tell es-Safi/Gath starts in just 10 days – on Sunday, June 23rd. The team members will be converging on the site in the next week or so, and meanwhile preparations are in full swing!
We have quite a nice sized team this year, with about 100 team members in weeks 1-2, about 80 in week 3, and just under 50 in week 4.
The team will be comprised of archaeologists, students and volunteers from various institutions (including: BIU, HU, BYU, YU, Ariel, Kentucky, Melbourne, CCU, URI, GVSU) and countries (including: Israel, USA, Canada, UK, Germany, Switzerland, Korea, China, Australia). Quite a diverse group of people!
On Tuesday, a small group of the core staff (Maria, Vanessa, Yaniv and Aren) were on site to mark off new squares in Areas M, K, K2 and Y. While the areas themselves are not covered to badly in thorns, a lot of the spaces in between have “mega thorns”! In fact, it may very well be that for the first few days, we will all experience a “game of thorns”!
See here a short video that will give you an idea.
Next week, on Wednesday, we’ll be out in the field with a tractor, for further preparations. This will include fixing up some of the dumps, trampling some of the thorns, and getting rid of some nasty “sabra” (prickly pear) cacti near Area K.
Then, on Thursday, some of the staff will be at BIU and Kfar Menahem, to pack and send various equipment for the season.
This are already moving along for what’s going to be a great season.
Looking forward to the people, the finds and the fun!
An English version of Nir Hasson’s article in Haaretz, on attempting (not that successful…) to make bread using our isolate yeast, has just appeared.
Check it out!
Just shows that we have just scratched the “tip of the iceberg” (or the edge of the loaf…) in applications of our ancient yeast study!
A new article, by Louise, Aren and Maddi has just appeared (see here). In this article we discuss possible manifestations of memory in post-Palatial cultures in the Iron Age Mediterranean, and how mnemohistory and nostalgia, contributed to symbolic behaviours in the transition between the Late Bronze and Iron Ages, in the Aegean and the Levant.
The full title is:
Hitchcock, L. A., Maeir, A. M., and Harris-Schober, M. 2019. Tomorrow Never Dies: Post-Palatial Memories of the Aegean Late Bronze Age in the Mediterranean. Pp. 543–49 in MNHMH/MNEME: Past and Memory in the Aegean Bronze Age. Proceedings of the 17th International Aegean Conference, University of Udine, Department of Humanities and Cultural Heritage, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Department of Humanities, 17–21 April 2018, eds. E. Borgna, I. Caloi, F. Carinci and R. Laffineur. AEGAEUM 43. Leuven: Peeters.
Prof. Christina Warinner, of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (Jena) will be giving a lecture on Wednesday, June 12th, 2019, at the Dental School of the Hebrew University (Ein Karem Campus).
She will be talking on: “The evolution and changing ecology of the human microbiome”
Here are the details:
A very nice two page Hebrew article on our yeasts, appeared today in the Israeli newspaper “Yediot Ahronot”. Check it out here.
Also, Yuval Gadot had a very nice interview, in Hebrew, for a popular radio show. Listen to it here.
היום היתה כתבת בת שני עמודים בידיעות על השמרים שלנו. ראו לינק כאן.
כמוכן, יובל גדות רואיין בתכנית הרדיו של גידי גוב. האזינו כאן.
Congratulations and Mazal Tov to Dr. Debi Cassuto!
We were officially informed today that Debi’s PhD dissertation was approved by the PhD committee at BIU.
Debi did her research on the evidence of Iron Age weaving at Tell es-Safi/Gath!
Way to go Debi!
Here are a few nice video clips on the beer/yeast discovery:
The official clip put out for the press (in Hebrew):
The official clip put out for the press (in English):
A very nice news item (in Hebrew) on Israel Channel 11 (Kan) news
And a nice clip (in English) from the Russian website Ruptly:
So the press is starting to publish the yeast stuff. Below is a list (which I’ll add to) of articles that appear (some of which have interesting quotes – or misquotes…):
Times of Israel (2nd article)
Telegraph (but they didn’t mention BIU…)
As previously mentioned, today we had a press conference on the yeast study. As you can see in the pictures below, quite a large group of journalists, from Israel and from the world, came to the conference, which was held in a very nice bar (Beeratenu) in downtown Jerusalem.
The journalists were very interested, took many pictures, conducted many interviews and asked a lot of questions, and rushed the bar when samples of the beer and mead that we made from the ancient yeasts was given out!
Stay tuned for the press about it. Should be cool!
Here are some pictures:
Later today, our study on finding ancient yeast in archaeological vessels (see here) is about to hit the Israeli and international press. We’re having a press conference about this in a couple of hours! So check the media this evening!
A new “Safi paper” has just appeared, spearheaded by Kent Fowler, on identifying the age and sex of potters based on fingerprints.The full title of the article is:Fowler, K. D., Walker, E., Greenfield, H. J., Ross, J., and Maeir, A. M. 2019. The Identity of Potters in Early States: Determining the Age and Sex of Fingerprints on Early Bronze Age Pottery from Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath, Israel. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory.Here’s the abstract:The organization of craft production has long been a marker for broader social, economic, and political changes that accompanied urbanism. The identity of producers who comprised production groups, communities, or workshops is out of reach using conventional archaeological data. There has been some success using epidermal prints on artifacts to identify the age and sex of producers. However, while age estimates are well developed, determining the sex of ancient potters is complicated by similarities between the prints of adult women and adolescents of either sex. Forensic research indicates that a combination of ridge breadth and density would best identify the age and sex of individuals. To this end, we propose an identification framework to classify fingerprints grounded in experimental and forensic research. In this study, we classify 38 fingerprints on Early Bronze Age (EB) III pottery from the early urban neighborhood at Tell eṣ-Ṣâfi/Gath, Israel. Mean ridge breadth (MRB) and mean ridge density (MRD) are used to distinguish the age and sex of prints after accounting for the shrinkage of calcareous fabrics used to make four type of vessels. We apply a modified version of the Kamp et al. (1999) regression equation to the MRB for each individual print. The MRD data are correlated to comparable data from populations with appropriate ancestry to infer sex. When the results are combined, our analyses indicate that two thirds of the
fingerprints were likely made by adult men and teenage boys and the remainder by adult women and adolescent girls. This result suggests that men or women were not exclusively making pottery at early urban centers in the Levant. This pattern contrasts a fingerprint study of post-state urban pottery production during the EB in northern Mesopotamia, which suggested women no longer made pottery after cities and states were established in the region.
I think this can be the theme song for the 2019 season at Tell es-Safi/Gath:Alice Merton – No RootsAnd here are the lyrics:I like digging holes and hiding things inside them
When I’ll grow old, I hope I won’t forget to find them
‘Cause I’ve got memories and travel like gypsies in the nightI build a home and wait for someone to tear it down
Then pack it up in boxes, head for the next town running
‘Cause I’ve got memories and travel like gypsies in the nightAnd a thousand times I’ve seen this road
A thousand timesI’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uhI’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uhI like standing still, but that’s just a wishful plan
Ask me where I come from, I’ll say a different land
But I’ve got memories and travel like gypsies in the nightI count gates and numbers, then play the guessing game
It’s just the place that changes, the rest is still the same
But I’ve got memories and travel like gypsies in the nightAnd a thousand times I’ve seen this road
A thousand timesI’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
I’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uhI like digging holes
Hiding things inside them
When I’ll grow old
I won’t forget to find them
I like digging holes
Hiding things inside them
When I’ll grow old
I won’t forget to find them
I’ve got no roots
I’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
I’ve got no roots, but my home was never on the ground
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
I’ve got no roots uh uh uh uh
Michel Freikman (a post-doc at Ariel University) and Kristina Reed (doctoral student at BIU) are organizing a conference entitled: “Monumentality in the Landscape”, which will be held at Bar-Ilan University and Ariel University on October 30-31, 2019. The RIAB Minerva Center will be a co-sponsor of the conference.
The conference plans to deal with issues related to the understanding of monumental
architecture in the context of the surrounding landscape. Topics related to the issue
include: degree of visibility of monuments in the ancient landscape and what the ways
are for a modern researcher to understand it, propaganda, ideology, and mythology
reflected through the prism of the monument, how a monument changes the landscape
around it, the phenomenon of nature as a focal point for ritual activity, and other topics
related to this field of study. This conference invites papers on a wide range of periods
from Prehistory to Ottoman.
Here is the call for papers for this very interesting conference: Monumentality in the Landscape Call 2019
I’m happy to announce the official publication of a new book series of Minerva Center for the Relations between Israel and Aram in Biblical Times (RIAB), which is affiliated to the Tell es-Safi/Gath Archaeological Project (and co-directed by Aren Maeir and Angelika Berlejung).
The new publication series of the RIAB Minerva Center – “Research on Israel and Aram in Biblical Times” (RIAB), is published by Mohr Siebeck (Tübingen), as a sub-series of the “Oriental Religions in Antiquity” (ORA) series.
The new series aims to publish volumes (monographs, collections, proceedings, etc.) dealing with topics that are directly and indirectly connected to the RIAB Center’s activities, covering the entire spectrum of topics that relate to the RIAB Center’s fields of interest.
The editors of the series, Prof. Angelika Berlejung and Prof. Aren Maeir, would be very happy to receive proposals for volumes to be published in the series – both by scholars affiliated with the center, as well as those who are not.
The first volume in the series has gone to press and will be out in August, 2019.
Here is the title of the first volume:
Berlejung, A., and Maeir, A. M., eds. 2019. Research on Israel and Aram: Autonomy, Interdependence and Related Issues. Proceedings of the First Annual RIAB Center Conference, Leipzig, June 2016. Research on Israel and Aram in Biblical Times (RIAB), Vol. 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
See here a flyer of the new series and details on the first volume that will appear in August 2019.
On Thursday, May 23rd, 2019, the RIAB Minerva Center is conducting a workshop for students on zooarchaeology in general and the Iron Age Levant in particular. The workshop will be given by Dr. Liora Horwitz of the Hebrew University.
Please note that the workshop is only open to those who pre-registered for it.
On Thursday, May 16th, I participated in the workshop on the LB/Iron Age transition at the sites of Tel Miqne-Ekron, Qubur al-Walayda and Megiddo East, that was held at the Albright Institute in Jerusalem.
Ann and Gunnar each presented a detailed survey of the stratigraphy and finds relating to the time frame covering the late LB and early Iron I at Miqne (Ann) and Qubur (Gunnar), followed by a short presentation by Aaron on the LB/Iron I finds from Megiddo East.
A lively discussion developed during and right after each lecture, with various members of the archaeological community in Israel participating.
After the lectures, the workshop participants then moved to look at a great selection of pottery from the relevant levels at this sites, which was set up in the Albright basement. A very interesting and lively discussion of these finds developed as well.
This was a fascinating workshop, with many insights. For me, in addition to seeing some really nice pottery from these sites that I had not seen previously, I came away with the impression that the finds from these sites only emphasize, the complex nature of the LB/Iron Age transition, and how many of the “standard,” and rather linear, explanations on this transition are in need of refinement, a more complex understanding – and even revision!
On Wednesday, I had the honor to participate in the dedication ceremony for the new entrance to the Tel Zafit National Park (Tell es-Safi/Gath). The funding for this entrance (and the bike path leading to it) was donated by “Dalia Power Energies“, the company that runs one of the two electric power stations near the tell, in memory of Mr. Eyal Shapira, z”l, who was a member of their board of directors. Thanks so much their donation – and for the Nature and Parks Authority who facilitated the donation and making these plans happen!
The work including fixing up the road leading up to the site, the main entrance road to the tell itself, and the area of the parking at the base of the site. This included a great parking area, some very nice shaded picnic areas, and some very nice signs, both on the way to the tell, and in and around the site itself.
This is a very substantial and important addition to the site, as it makes the site much more accessible to the public. In addition, the Nature and Parks Authority fixed up (and even changed) some of the paths on the site, making them much more easier for use.
This will be important for the team as well in the coming season. The road to the site is much better, and the buses and other vehicles will be able to drive in a much easier manner to the site. In addition, the breakfast area is now really nice – which will make our breakfast and fruit breaks much more enjoyable!
Below are some pictures of the ceremony and the new entrance.
Those of you who are familiar with the site from previous years will be quite surprised with the changes!
See as well the views of the tell. While it’s not as green as it was even a week or two ago, it’s still quite overgrown due to the massive rainfall this winter.
By Angela HusterOne form of Aztec jewelry were decorative objects worn through a piercing in a person’s lower lip, known as bezotes in Spanish and lip plugs or labrets in English. They can be made out of different materials – bone, clay, obsidian, or other stones – and come in various shapes. While there are a few very fancy examples in museums, with gold and turquoise inlays, most examples are much simpler. In Central Mexico, “T-shaped” lip plugs are traditionally associated with the Otomi ethnic group, based on historic documents. In her excavations at Xaltocan, Lisa Overholtzer (2015) showed that T-shaped lip plugs were used during the Middle Postclassic, and and wider, flatter "Button-shaped" ones were used during the Late Postclassic. However, people seem to have switched forms before the Aztec conquest of the site, suggesting that they may have actively manipulated their ethnic identity in anticipation of shifts in regional power.
The rock crystal and obsidian lip plugs from Calixtlahuaca (plus a copper earspool on the left)At Calixtlahuaca, we recovered two T-shaped lip plugs (one made out of obsidian and one of rock crystal), and two button-shaped ones (both made out of clay). Both T-shaped pieces come from Ninupi phase contexts. One of the button-shaped ones comes from a Ninupi phase context and the other from a Yata phase context. The fact that we recovered so few examples of lip plugs is interesting, since the Otomi were one of the ethnic groups who lived in the Toluca Valley. The phasing of the few lip plugs we did find parallels the findings from Xaltocan; T-shaped lip plugs are earlier and from prior to the Aztec conquest of the site, and button-shaped ones are more likely to be later, from the period under Aztec rule, but there’s some fuzziness. However, because Calixtlahuaca was conquered by the Aztecs later than Xaltocan was, the transition in forms occurs later in calendar time; instead of a change between the Middle and Late Postclassic, the switch in forms occurs between the two halves of the Late Postclassic.
The ceramic lip plugs from CalixtlahuacaBecause lip plugs are low frequency objects (even at sites where they are more common than at Calixtlahuaca!), it can be hard for any one project to find enough to identify meaningful patterns. As a result, it is important for projects to publish good descriptions of their rare finds and their proveniences, so that a larger regional sample can eventually be put together. We are currently writing the informe chapter on miscellaneous ceramic objects at Calixtlahuaca – which includes, but certainly isn’t limited to, lip plugs.Works Cited:Overholtzer, Lisa M.2015 Agency, practice, and chronological context: A Bayesian approach to household chronologies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 37:37-47.
The Ackerman Family Conference on Biblical Archaeology, which was held in 2014, and included an assortment of excellent papers on the Late Bronze Age and early Iron Age in Canaan, is about to be published as a proceedings volume.
The volume, “The Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages of Southern Canaan“, edited by A. M. Maeir, I. Shai and C. McKinny, has just gone to press, and will be published by de Gruyter as part of new series (Archaeology of the Biblical Worlds) that is associated with the “Encyclopedia of the Bible and its Reception” (series editors: A. M. Maeir and H. Goldfuss).
Hopefully, the volume will be out in a couple of months!
And if already – there are two more edited volumes that are about to appear: Tell es-Safi/Gath II (eds. A. M. Maeir and J. Uziel) and the Proceedings of the 1st annual meeting of the RIAB Minerva Center (eds. A. Berlejung and A. M. Maeir)! More to come on these two volumes in the near future!
As usual, we will have a nice slate of field tours and lectures this upcoming excavation season (see below). We also still have a few spots left! If you are on the fence about coming this summer – get off the fence and come help us find the gate
TEL BURNA 2019 LECTURES (Tentative):
Each week there will be various lectures and tours. Monday is touring sites in the region with an emphasis on sites recently or currently being excavated. There will be three lectures each week. Lectures focus on 1) principles and methods of excavation, 2) history and archaeology of the southern Levant, and 3) various approaches to analysis of the material record.
- S Tel Burna-A Decade of Research (Prof. Itzick Shai)
- M Site Tour: Northern Shephelah: Beth Shemesh, Gezer
- T Bib Arch in 21st C (Prof. Itzick Shai) or Arch Meth & Theory (Prof. Steven Ortiz)
- W Tombs Remembered – Tombs Forgotten: Studying the Iron Age Tombs and Tomb Inscriptions from Jerusalem (Prof. Matthew Suriano)
- Th Principles of Field Documentation- PlanGrid (Dr. Chris McKinny); Photogrammetry (Dr. Jane Gaastra)
- Fri-Sat: Weekend Study Tours: The Judean Wilderness and the Negev (Dr. Chris McKinny)
- M Archaeological Site Survey: Method and Practice (Dr. Aharon Tavger)
- T Site Tour: Gath of the Philistines: Tel es-Safi (Prof. Aren Maeir)
- W Late Bronze Age (PhD student Marcella Barbosa)
- Th Zooarchaeology and Archaeo-Botany (Prof. Tina Greenfield and Dr. Andrea Orendi)
- Fri-Sun 3-Day weekend for Study Tour: The Northern Regions (coast, Galilee, Golan Heights) (Dr. Chris McKinny)
- S Site Tour: E-Rai (Prof. Yossi Garfinkel) and Lachish (Dig Staff)
- T Textile Workshop (Dr. Debi Cassuto)
- W Iron Age (Dr. Aharon Tavger)
- Th GIS and Archaeology (Prof. Ladislav Smedja) + Soil Analysis – (Prof. Michael Hejman)
- Fri-Sun Weekend Study Tour: Jerusalem and its environs (Dr. Chris McKinny)
- M Site Tour: TBD
- T TBD
- W Final Photos
- Th (at Ariel University) Ceramic Restoration Process + Shiloh (Drs. Chris McKinny and Aharon Tavger)
Today (May 7, 2019) a gave a tour of Tell es-Safi/Gath for a group of fellows from the Albright Institute in Jerusalem. We walk around the upper and lower tells for three hours, and it was really nice.
What’s very noticeable are the thorns! Are they enormous! Some of them are about 3 m high!!
See below a short, and very nice (!) clip, produced by the American Friends of Bar-Ilan University, highlighting archaeology at BIU, the excavations at Tell es-Safi/Gath – and me… :-)
For those of you who are already familiar with the team, you’ll notice a few familiar faces (and hands…) from the team in the clip. And they couldn’t help themselves, they had to have a picture of me putting on my hat…
For those still interested in joining us this seasons at Tell es-Safi/Gath (June 23-July 19), and you have not yet registered signed up, the registration deadline has been extended until May 15th, 2019.
If you want to register, go to the online registration now! Be there – or be square!
We are happy to announce that our paper on the two Cypriot Pithoi found in Area B1 has been published!
Here is the abstract:
Bronze Age trade in the Eastern Mediterranean is well attested in south Levantine archaeological research, with imported vessels generally playing a significant role in the ceramic assemblage. While the majority of these vessels are found repeatedly at many different sites, there are cases where a rare find sheds new light on the way in which trade patterns are perceived. Such is the case with two fully restored pithoi found in a Late Bronze IIB building at Tel Burna. This paper presents the context in which the pithoi were uncovered, followed by a study of the vessels themselves, including their typology, provenance, volume and contents, as well as the nature of Late Bronze Age trade in the Eastern Mediterranean.
The full bibliographic details:
2019: Shai, I.; McKinny, C.; Spigelman, Ben-Shlomo, D., Karasik, A., Namdar, D., and Uziel, J. Late Bronze Age Trade as Seen through the Eyes of Two Cypriot Pithoi on a Shephelah Hilltop. Tel Aviv 46: 63–80.
I’m at a conference on ancient food at the Weltenberg Abby in Germany, and my colleagues and I are about to present a new fantastic study that we’ve been working on, on the isolation of ancient yeast cells from archaeological contexts!
The article is entitled:
Aouizerat T, Gutman I, Paz Y, Maeir AM, Gadot Y, Gelman D, Szitenberg A, Drori E, Pinkus A, Schoemann M, Kaplan R, Ben-Gedalya T, Coppenhagen-Glazer S, Reich E, Saragovi A, Lipschits O, Klutstein M, Hazan R. 2019.
Isolation and characterization of live yeast cells from ancient vessels as a tool in bioarchaeology. (https://mbio.asm.org/content/10/2/e00388-19)
This is a truly ground-breaking study – which took three years to bring to press!
See below the abstract:
ABSTRACT Ancient fermented food has been studied based on recipes, residue
analysis, and ancient-DNA techniques and reconstructed using modern domesticated yeast. Here, we present a novel approach based on our hypothesis that enriched yeast populations in fermented beverages could have become the dominant species in storage vessels and their descendants could be isolated and studied today. We developed a pipeline of yeast isolation from clay vessels and screened for yeast cells in beverage-related and non-beverage-related ancient vessels and sediments from several archaeological sites. We found that yeast cells could be successfully isolated specifically from clay containers of fermented beverages. The findings that genotypically the isolated yeasts are similar to those found in traditional African beverages and phenotypically they grow similar to modern beer-producing yeast strongly suggest that they are descendants of the original fermenting yeast. These results demonstrate that modern microorganisms can serve as a new tool in bio-archaeology research.
IMPORTANCE So far, most of the study of ancient organisms has been based mainly
on the analysis of ancient DNA. Here we show that it is possible to isolate and study
microorganisms—yeast in this case—from ancient pottery vessels used for fermentation. We demonstrate that it is highly likely that these cells are descendants of the original yeast strains that participated in the fermentation process and were absorbed into the clay matrix of the pottery vessels. Moreover, we characterized the isolated yeast strains, their genomes, and the beer they produced. These results open new and exciting avenues in the study of domesticated microorganisms and contribute significantly to the fields of bio- and experimental archaeology that aim to reconstruct ancient artifacts and products
Pascal Partouche, who used to take the end of season aerial photos using a balloon, and is now a drone aficionado, kindly posted some great drone photos and a really nice video clip of the upper tell.
The photos are of areas J, E, A and F, while the video, flies over the upper tell, from east to west.
Check it out!
The 2019 season at Tell es-Safi/Gath is just around the corner. We will be in the field from June 23rd until July 19th, 2019.
I promise you that you will have the experience of a lifetime!
Be there – or be square!
(note – if you join us – you be IN a square…)
Today, we were honored to host his Excellency, Mr. Zhan Yognxin, Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to Israel, at the Tell es-Safi/Gath lab at BIU.
The ambassador and his entourage, along with Prof. Yaron Harel (Dean of the Faculty of Jewish Studies at BIU) and Dr. Danielle Gurevitch (Chair, the Sir Naim Dangoor Centre for Universal Monotheism, BIU), stopped by at the lab as part of a visit to BIU.
In the lab, I explained to them about our work, some of the finds, and various exciting things relating to the project.
They also had a chance to meet my new PhD student from China, Jiang.
I do hope further connections with China and Chinese institutions will develop from this. It would be great to have a Chinese contingent on dig!
Here are some pictures from the visit:
A new article on the fortifications of Tell es-Safi/Gath has just appeared. The study,based on a talk given at a meeting in Haifa a few years ago, was spearheaded by Eric Welch, along with several of the Safi team.In this study, the fortifications of the site are discussed, and in particular, in comparison to finds and interpretations of Bliss and Macalisters’ excavations at the site in 1899, as opposed to what we now know based on our work for the last 23 years or so.The article can be found at this link.The full title is:Welch, E. L., Chadwick, J. R., Shai, I., Katz, J., Greenfield, H., Dagan, A., and Maeir, A. M.2019. “The Limits of the Ancient City”: The Fortifications of Tell es-Safi/Gath 115 Years After Bliss and Macalister. Pp. 151–66 in Exploring the Holy Land: 150 Years of the Palestine Exploration Fund, eds. D. Gurevich and A. Kidron. London: Equinox.
A new article on ancient technologies in the Iron Age Philistine culture, has just appeared. The article was published in a special issue of the Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies, with several studies focusing on ancient technology, in honor of Dr. Nava Panitz-Cohen.The article, written by 16 of researchers who are connected to the Safi project, examines what we know and can learn about technologies (in a broad sense of the term) in use in the Iron Age Philistine culture, using the finds from Philistine Tell es-Safi/Gath as a case study, and how this can shed light on a broad range of issues relating to the Philistines and the Iron Age Levant. Special attention is placed on the importance of the study of technology for elucidating broad aspects of ancient culture.The full title is:Maeir, A. M., Ben-Shlomo, D., Cassuto, D., Chadwick, J. R., Davis, B., Eliyahu Behar, A., Frumin, S., Gur-Arieh, S., Hitchcock, L. A., Horwitz, L. K., Manclossi, F., Rosen, S., Verduci, J., Welch, E. L., Weiss, E., and Workman, V. 2019. Technological Insights on Philistine Culture: Perspectives from Tell es-Safi/Gath. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 7(1): 76–118.Aren
I will be in NY in the beginning of April, 2019, and I will be giving a few lectures. Here is one that is open to the public:
New York Aegean Bronze Age Colloquium: Monday, 1 April 2019, 6:00 pm (Hemmerdinger Screening Room (Library, Room E706), Hunter College): New Insights on the Philistines and the Sea Peoples in Light of Two Decades of Excavations at Tell es-Safi—Gath of the Philistines
Be there – or be square!
Aharon and myself have just received the proofs of our article entitled “From Lebonah to Libnah” which discusses the sites of Lebonah (near Shiloh, see Judges 21:19) and Libnah.
See here for the announcement. Below is the full bibliographic details with abstract of the paper.
2019: McKinny, Chris; Tavger, Aharon. 6. “From Lebonah to Libnah: Historical Geographical Details from the PEF and other Early Secondary Sources on the Toponymy of Two Homonymous Sites.” Pp. 107-122. Exploring the Holy Land – 150 Years of the Palestine Exploration Fund , edited by D. Guervich and A. Kidron. Equinox eBooks Publishing, United Kingdom.
“There are three instances of toponyms based on לבנ in the Bible. These include Libnah/Laban of the wilderness Sinai wanderings (Num 33:20; Deut 1:1), Lebonah of Ephraim (Judg 21:19), and Libnah of the Judean Shephelah (e.g., Josh 10:29-31). Notably, the latter two are possibly preserved in Arabic toponyms from 19th century Palestine. These toponyms were recorded with varying spellings in such cartographic projects as the Van de Velde’s Map of the Holy Land (1854, 1858, 1865), Warren’s unpublished Reconnaissance of the Plain of Philistia (1867), and Conder and Kitchener’s Survey of Western Palestine (1882, 1883, 1880), the latter two which were conducted under the auspices of the Palestine Exploration Fund. Using these and other cartographic sources as the basis for our discussion, we will analyze the etymology and site identifications of Lebonah of Ephraim and Libnah of the Shephelah in connection with their occurrences in the various post-biblical sources with the purpose of understanding the linguistic development of the לבנ toponyms from the biblical period to pre-modern times. Our analysis shows that the toponymic history of these sites corroborates the current identifications of Lebonah with el-Lubban and Libnah with Tell Bornat.”
Wow, wow, wow!
Dr. Brent Davis (Melbourne) Safi core staff member, who is also a world leader in ancient Aegean languages and scripts, has been awarded the Michael Ventris Award for Mycenaean Studies for 2019!
At Safi – we already knew that Brent was great! This is yet another international recognition of this!
Here’s a picture of Brent (in the middle) with the Area K2 team in 2017.
Way to go Brent!
Yesterday (March 10, 2019), Maria, Shira and I made a quick visit to Tell es-Safi/Gath, to see how it looks after the rains.
As you can see in the photos below – it looks quite cool. Totally green, with some very tall thorns in some areas (but for the most part, not in the excavation areas). Even though I’ve seen this often before, the view of the tell and its surroundings when it is totally green and overgrown is simply stunning.
Another nice thing is that the road leading to the tell is being paved all the way to the tell – which will make access much easier and quicker.
To our surprise and consternation, the project to develop the parking area started without being coordinated with us, and when we arrived at the site, were rather shocked to see a small “bobcat” tractor excavating a foundation trench for one of the walls of the new entrance area, right near Area D. Needless to say, we stopped them immediately and called the regional inspector of the Israel Antiquities Authority. Turns out, there was a lot of “lack of communication” (…) between the various involved parties, who for reason did not think it was urgent to have the archaeologist in charge of excavating the site involved…
So it was lucky that I had a sudden urge to look at the site, and hopefully, now, things will be better planned and coordinated (sheesh…)
And if already – don’t forget to sign up for the 2019 season!
Be there – or be square!!
Here are some pictures of the tell and the various areas:
Last year, Boaz Zissu, Rafi Kent and yours truly received an equipment grant from the ISF to purchase some really cool equipment. This included a airborne LIDAR scanner (carried on a drone) and a hand held LIDAR scanner (GeoSLAM Zeb-Revo).
We are now in the process of starting to use this equipment and several students at BIU are being trained in the use of the equipment.
A couple of weeks ago, Itamar Berko, who is an MA student in our department, did a LIDAR scan of a rather complex cave at Maresha. He walked around the cave for about 40 minutes, holding the scanner. Then, based on the collected data, he produced a really cool 3D model of the cave.
See this link to check out the 3D model. Try it out and move around in the cave – it is quite astounding!
And this is the result of a very short scan! Imagine the detail that could be produced from a much more extended scan!
Definitely very cool. We hope to start using these tools in various manners in the near future.
On Thursday, March 7th, and 16:00, a very interesting workshop will be conducted at the Albright Institute in Jerusalem.
The workshop, entitled “A ‘GLOBAL TURN’ FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY OF THE SOUTHERN LEVANT”, will be given by Oystein LaBianca (Andrews University) and Terje Stordalen (University of Oslo), and respondents will be Ann Killebrew (Penn State Univ) and yours truly (Aren M. Maeir, BIU).
See here for an overview of what will be discussed.
Should be interesting! If you are in this neck of the woods, hope to see you there!
One Person’s Trash . . .
As promised, a short report on new architecture in the West Settlement: we do have more “walls” (still generally only one brick high, but clearly outlining built structures laid out along a NE-SW grid) in the West Settlement. These line up with walls uncovered in earlier seasons, and also connect with ones excavated by Barry Kemp in the 1970s. The wadi has washed out anything that might have remained to the east (What Lies Beneath), but the settlement does continue to the west and perhaps also to the north, and promises to yield more information in future seasons.
But today’s blog is about our “midden.” We have uncovered a large (about 2 and a half meters in diameter) deposit that spans the border between two of our squares, an area we are calling Feature 201. On the surface, this looked like the usual sort of sherd scatter, but as we began to clean and clear, we discovered that it continued for a several levels, and was thick with large and small sherds and lots of faunal remains. These include bones of various sizes, bits of hide, and even several parts of hooves.
A preliminary look at the pottery (with which we have filled 26 of our yellow bags so far) suggests a higher percentage of the elite “Palace” ware than we’ve found in most of the rest of the site, although we will need to analyze it properly before coming to any conclusions.
This is larger than other such deposits we have found in previous seasons. It is also not clear how it relates to our architecture – other deposits have tended to be along walls or in corners, or even used as leveling fill under walls (Broken Dishes); this looks like it might go over a wall, although we will need to do more excavation here to find out for sure.
This is an intriguing deposit, and one that is sure to yield interesting and useful information once it has been completely cleared and the material recovered has been studied by our experts.
We have had a number of volunteers sign-up over the last couple of weeks – but we still have some spots left! If you are interested in joining the project for this summer’s season – please click here. We have extended the deadline until April 15. You can also check out our freshly updated site in the “Academic” section to see how you can get academic credit for the excavation and also take part in the weekend tours.
Dr. Brent Davis (Univ. Melbourne; long-time core staff team member of the Safi project) is a master at various ancient languages. Now, he has harnessed virtual reality technology (VR) to teach ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphics.
Check out the cool video below, where students are reading the hieroglyphs from a VR model of Nefertari’s tomb!
Very Cool! Way to go Brent!
<p><a href=”https://vimeo.com/300627980″>Learning Hieroglyphics in the Tomb of Nefertari in Virtual Reality</a> from <a href=”https://vimeo.com/artsunimelb”>Arts Unimelb</a> on <a href=”https://vimeo.com”>Vimeo</a>.</p>
I’d Rather Have a Handle Than a Nail
First of all, spoiler alert. We are finding more architecture in the West Settlement, but more on that later. In the meantime, Mahmoud, Ja’allan, and Sa’ad, with assistance from our sharp-eyed junior workmen, continue to find bits and pieces of this and that among the sherds and bones — a bead here, part of a ring shank there, and of course pottery everywhere. It’s especially interesting to see what lies in the sterile levels just above what we consider the desert surface – the other day we found bits of a very dead and dried out scorpion, a small egg of some sort, and some pieces of very modern-looking bread.
Today, Mahmoud was working in a promising looking deposit of sherds near the surface, and found this very interesting object.
It seems to be made out of some sort of metal, and looked at first like perhaps it was a handle from a small vessel. But that didn’t really make sense, so I took it to my colleagues over in the Industrial Site for a consultation. We looked at it together, and Diana noticed the red color indicating rust. So we were able to rule out immediately that it was ancient, since iron would not have been used for any sort of vessel – the only iron available to the Egyptians at that time was meteoric.
Ivor happened to be there as well, having left his “photo studio” (otherwise known as the guard hut) to take some photographs for Diana. He took one look and suggested that it might be a nail that had gotten bent. We all thought that was a great idea, and Hassan confirmed that it was most likely an old-fashioned nail, no longer used but found in antique furniture and older buildings.
It’s always interesting to see what wanders into an archaeological deposit!
What’s the Point
Diana Craig Patch
Every season the work at the Industrial Site has produced a wonderful example of a tool. In 2015, almost immediately after opening the first square, we found a perfect flint awl. In 2016 and 2017, we were intrigued by what appeared to be discarded copper alloy drill bits. This year we have a spectacular micro-chisel.
All of us are familiar with chisels. Very practical tools, they can be fashioned with different types of edges that allow a craftsman to accomplish the splitting or cutting of stone, wood, and metal. If the task requires splitting stone or wood, a big chisel is positioned and then hit with a hammer, or in the case of ancient Egypt, probably a wood mallet. When chisels are needed for finer work, the tool is pushed into the material by hand in order to remove what isn’t wanted. The size of the chisel and the style of the edge changes depending on what the work is; smaller chisels are needed for detailed work in wood and other soft materials.
This tiny copper alloy chisel, only 2.5 cm long, is perfectly formed and remarkably preserved. The slightly reduced and rounded proximal end may have been designed as such to be hafted in a small wood handle that would have made it easier to manipulate the tool. The distal end was fashioned into a sharp beveled edge that is somewhat splayed, allowing a craftsman to cut the material cleanly, or to trim or neaten tiny grooves or spaces in the object under manufacture.
Our Inspector, Mr. Mahmoud Kamal
Diana Craig Patch
We get to pursue our fieldwork in Egypt because of the generosity of the Ministry of Antiquities. Part of the contract that I sign with them is that a representative from the Supreme Council of Antiquities will work with us during the time we are digging. This year we are lucky to have Mr. Mahmoud Kamal Abu elWafa. Mr. Mahmoud Kamal comes from Luxor, specifically Karnak village, so he grew up surrounded by the amazing antiquities the east bank has to offer. He is a 2009 graduate of Qena University with a degree in Egyptology. His specialty is New Kingdom history and he especially likes the large temples of Karnak and Luxor and everything about the Valley of the Kings.
He joined the SCA in 2012 and has been busy every year. In 2014, he took part in a field school under Mr. Yasser Mahmoud at Deir el Shelwit, the Ptolemaic temple in the southern part of Malqata. He worked with the Polish mission at Deir el Bahri in 2015 and then in 2016 and 2017 worked with the American Research Center in Egypt, first at TT110, a decorated tomb of a royal butler named Djehuty, and then in painted New Kingdom tombs in Dra Abu Naga.
We are delighted Mr. Mahmoud decided he wanted to join the Malqata team this year and we look forward to working with him for the next ten days.
Looking for funding that will help you join the Safi team this summer?
Check out the Jane C. Waldbaum Archaeological Field School Scholarship of the American Institute of Archaeology.
It’s for undergraduate students at institutions in the USA
Bag It and Tag It
Archaeology requires the systematic collection of objects that were either made, modified, or used by people. By studying these material remains in relation to the environment in which they were produced, archaeologists attempt to understand the lives of those who used them. The process of collecting artifacts may appear somewhat tedious, but it is anything but that. Processing is a crucial part of an archaeological excavation.
This season as the archaeological assistant for the Industrial Site, I am working alongside Diana and Jan to help process all of the objects that are uncovered. As we continue to look for the production center of the glass and faience industry, we are finding manufacturing byproducts including molds, crucible fragments, and vitreous material, which are fragments of glass and faience. Our team follows a very specific method for processing these discoveries.
As our workmen excavate methodically by layer or level depending on the context, they set aside all of the finds onto a tray. These artifacts are then sorted by type. At the Industrial Site, all of the material can be divided into two major categories, manufacturing debris and objects. All of the material that has been worked or used by ancient craftsmen gets bagged. However, the process for the two types of finds varies slightly.
Left: An unsorted tray of finds from the Industrial Site.
Right: The same tray from the left, after being sorted by object type.
The manufacturing debris, or the excess raw material and product from production, is further divided by type. Remains of the same kind are put together in one bag with its contextual data written on the exterior. Every bag lists the site name; the year; the square number; the level, feature or locus number; the object type, and finally the date found. This process is duplicated for the objects, like beads, molds, and tools. These objects are also assigned a unique number. This number is very similar to the accession numbering system that is used at a museum like The Metropolitan Museum of Art. These artifacts are tracked separately from the manufacturing debris because they are recorded differently as they often tell us a lot more information.
Left: An example of a bag for diagnostic pottery along with its matching tag.
Right: Fragment of a mold found during the 2019 season with its bag and tag.
Afterwards, a tag is created with the same data found the bags. These cards are then placed inside with the sorted material. Creating a tag may seem like an unnecessary and repetitive step, however, it is crucial. The material remains that are found during the excavation are only one aspect of the archaeological record. In order to properly interpret our finds, we need to evaluate them within the context in which they were found. It is therefore extremely important that we keep the findspot information with objects, as well as in our notes. Writing the information on the tag provides insurance that the provenance information will stay with the material in perpetuity. This is essential not only for the JEM’s research, but also for any future scholars who may work at Malqata.
Once the objects are bagged and tagged, they are sent to Diana and Jan for processing. At this stage, they write initial descriptions about each find, as well as their thoughts about any correlation to glass and faience production. In addition, they record the weight of carnelian debris and take record photographs of the manufacturing waste. Subsequently, all of the objects are sent to Ivor for photography.
Right: Diana and Jan writing descriptions of the objects from the Industrial Site.
Left: Ivor photographing objects.
Processing archaeological finds does not stop there. At the end of the season, we will continue to analyze and record information about each piece. In the secondary phase, Diana, Jan and I will draw objects in preparation for the final report and for future publications. Furthermore, all of the data collected will be transferred into a FileMaker database that was designed by Janice specifically for the work at JEM. Having a digital record of this data preserves an additional copy of our work for the season. It will also allow Diana and Jan to continue working on the material for publication outside of Egypt.
What Kind of Bowl Is This?
Last year was my first at the West Settlement site of Malqata. I focused on developing record forms for the registration of each group of sherds found and another form to record the diagnostic sherds (rims, bases, handles, etc.). The purpose of both forms is to enable Janice to upload the pottery data collected into her database where it can be combined with other information from each square.
Having completed the initial sorting and recording of the pottery bags from 2016 last year, this year we began with the analysis of the diagnostic sherds. This is what ceramicists often call “typing” –that is comparing each rim or base to an established reference type; in our case we are comparing them to the pottery illustrated in The Eighteenth Dynasty Pottery Corpus from Amarna by Pamela Rose. This pottery is very close in date and purpose to that found at Malqata.
Each diagnostic sherd is then recorded on our new form, which includes additional information such as size and surface treatment. Sometimes they require a bit of sticking together and then being left to dry in our makeshift sandbox. Complete or nearly complete examples are set aside for drawing and photography so that we will be able to illustrate from our own material the kinds of pottery found in the West Settlement.
Red Sky At Night . . .
Here is the beautiful red sunset that we saw from our hotel on Wednesday night:
But this did not herald “excavators’ delight. On Thursday morning, we arrived at the site to find gale-force winds blowing!
We ran around and made sure everything was battened down, and then we came home.
On Wednesday evening, Feb. 20th, 2019, I will be giving a lecture, in Hebrew, at the Bible Lands Museum in Jerusalem, on the results of the recent seasons of excavations at Tell es-Safi/Gath. In the lecture, I will focus, in particular, on the finds from the lower city.
So, if you’re in the region – you are invited!
Tracking Pot Designs
Who doesn’t love blue painted pottery? I certainly do, so it’s hard to discard non-diagnostic sherds to the spoil heap. When I found a large sherd with a pattern that I didn’t recognise I kept it with the diagnostics to check with Diana. Although produced from the mid-18th Dynasty through to the 20th Dynasty it’s difficult not to think of these vessels as ‘Amarna blue’ pottery. We all know the traditional repetitive lily petal motif because that pattern, with the decorative banded lines above and below, is the most common decorative scheme. Occasionally, you get the wonderful reliefs of Hathor or Bes on a vessel, or a freehand naturalistic scene of great artistry, but the lily petal motif is almost like a production line of limited variation. So when I saw the row of flattened oval circles it caught my attention. Diana agreed that it was a rare motif so I searched for comparisons both online and in the literature.
Decorating cream slipped ware followed a step-by-step process: first the ‘Amarna blue’ thick bands are applied, these can be haphazard but our sherd is reasonably good. The four blue ‘leaves’ arranged in a loose oval shape which form our basic design were probably done at the same time while the blue paint was on the brush. Then black and red stripes were applied. The four ovoids were probably outlined in black at the same time as the blue bands were. It’s the black outline to each oval leaf that gives it its definition and the four ovoids then make a distinctive flattened circle. The red dots were probably added last (Rose 2007). The number of bands of decoration depend on the size of the vessel. Only one band survives fully on our sherd but there is an indication of another, different, decorative element above the top stripes. Of course, we can’t tell for certain what shape the vessel was but it seems possible that it was the traditional straight necked, full bodied jar so familiar in these designs.
Even on our small sherd with only one complete decorative motif, and a partial motif on either side with the stripes above and below, it is possible to see how carelessly the preliminary blue stripe and leaf pattern was applied before the black and red stripes and outline were added to give coherence to the design.
This design does not appear in the Amarna corpus (Rose 2007) and the only similar motif I found after extensive searching was on Plate 8 of Colin Hope’s ‘Malkata’ corpus in his Pottery of the New Kingdom, so perhaps this is a design specific to the heb-sed festival site of Amenhotep III.
Hope has suggested (1989) that the manufacture of blue-painted pottery may well have been a specialised activity and the work of only a few potters, indicated by the standardisation of the designs and motifs which were applied to particular shapes. The use of the blue pigment (cobalt aluminate spinel, probably sourced in the Dakhla oasis) in the colour scheme may further support the idea of a restricted manufacture, as the raw ingredients would not have been widely available.
The distribution of blue-painted ware is found in large quantities only at Thebes and Amarna, and later at Memphis with some found at Gurob and Saqqara. However, it must be remembered that these vessels are containers for desired contents that are shipped from one centre to another, so the find location does not necessary indicate the place of manufacture.
However illustrious the context of our sherd it still seems to agree with the rule that blue painted vessels were mass produced and decorated by rote on a wheel or turntable. This may come as a shock to lovers of ‘Amarna blue’ pottery.
Hope, C. A. 1989. Pottery of the Egyptian New Kingdom – Three Studies. Burwood.
Rose, P. J. 2007. The Eighteenth Dynasty Pottery Corpus from Amarna. Egypt Exploration Society Excavation Memoir, 83. London.
If you read Hebrew, an excellent book on the history of Mesopotamia in the early 2nd Millennium BCE has appeared:
Wasserman, N., and Block, Y. 2019. The Amorites: Mesopotamia in the Early Second Millennium BCE (In Hebrew). Jerusalem: Carmel.
Hopefully, an English version will appear in the future.
Where Do We Go From Here?
In the West Settlement, my first task at the beginning of the season is to decide where to excavate next. We talk about it at the end of the previous season, and make some tentative plans, but I continue to think about it as I finish processing my notes and photographs. And then I always try to arrive back at Malqata with fresh eyes.
Some of my priorities for this season are to continue to clarify the footprint of the site, and to see how it relates to other areas. On the east (local north), we are interested in seeing how the West Settlement connects to the Industrial Site where Diana is working. In order to explore the latter question, I am moving in that direction, but in 2.5 meter trenches rather than full 5 meter squares, since it is possible (in fact, likely) that we will be going through the wadi that has washed out any traces of the settlement to the north (see What Lies Beneath). We can’t go too far to the east or we will hit the old Met spoil heaps, but we will go as far as we can.
To the west, we are interested in seeing if we can connect the current excavations to a series of partial foundations uncovered in “Trench P” by Barry Kemp a number of years ago. Dr. Kemp has been so kind as to share information from his forthcoming publication of this work, so we know that his walls line up with ours, and that that one of them continues the thicker wall (laid in headers rather than stretchers) that seems to serve as the boundary of the settlement.
Our surveyor, Piet Collet, has helped to lay out new squares to both the east and the west. We are stringing them up and getting to work, so stay tuned!
On Thursday, February 21, 2019 (11:00-13:00), a very interesting workshop will be held at Bar-Ilan University – on the production of ancient coins – replicating ancient production technologies.
The workshop will be led by Yeshu Drei – who is an expert on recreating ancient technologies.
The workshop is open to all!
See more details in the following PDF:
Today (Wed., Feb. 6, 2019) the 8th and final lesson of the MOOC on biblical archaeology went online. You can still register, and study, this round of the course until Feb. 20th. Those who sign up before that date will have access (full access for those who register for certification, and partial access [only to video clips] for those who register for auditing only).
All told, close to 2400 students registered from the course, from all over the world!
The MOOC will run again in the first semester of the next academic year at BIU (which starts in Oct. 2019). At that time, I hope we will have captions for the videos in English, Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, German, Russian and French – and perhaps a few additional languages as well.
So – if you missed registering and doing the MOOC this time – you’ll have another opportunity in a few months!
I had a lot of fun preparing this MOOC, had some great help from my assistants and the technical team of “Online Academe” – and from the responses of many of the participants – they had a great and enriching experience as well!
Our Colleague, Dr. Mohamed Abdelaziz
Diana Craig Patch
When you work in Egypt, part of the process of getting into the field is signing the contract that allows you to work at your site. This step is carried out in the office of the Head of Foreign Missions of the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA) in Cairo. For me, signing the contract is very serious business because when my signature as expedition director is added to the paper I accept the responsibility of an important site, Malqata, for the period of time I am working there.
After receiving the contract, I take this agreement to be approved at the local level, which for Malqata requires signatures from the Luxor and West Bank inspectorates of the SCA. This season I was the last mission to have its contract approved in Luxor by the former General Director of Upper Egypt, Dr. Mohamed Abdelaziz, who retired last Monday. I have known Dr. Abdelaziz for many years because he served as the General Director of the West Bank inspectorate for three of the seasons (2012-2014) we have worked at Malqata. In this position, Dr. Abdelaziz was in charge of what could take place at Malqata during the excavation, so we were in regularly contact each year. I always found him welcoming and helpful in supporting the work at our site. By 2015, he had been promoted and we no longer saw him on the West Bank, but instead greeted him in the East Bank office, although we saw him much less often.
Now that he has retired, the team working at Malqata will miss a good friend, but we wish him all the very best in the coming years and hope he will come to visit us.
The best part of the video is of course in the very beginning, when Tell es-Safi/Gath is called (0:10) – “the greatest biblical site in the Holy Land“!! I’ll buy that! :-)
While there are things, here and there, that I would have presented differently (;-), you do get a very nice view of different parts of the site (and when the site is very green), and discussions on different parts of the site’s history.
Check it out!
We were greatly saddened today to hear of the sudden passing of our wonderful inspector during our 2017 season, Walla Abd el Moged Hussein. We remember her very fondly, and wish to express our heartfelt condolences to her family and colleagues. Walla was extremely kind and helpful, and especially loved to work with Diana to sort and identify the material coming from the excavations at the Industrial Site.
We thank Walla for all of her assistance and friendship. We will never forget her, and she will be greatly missed.
A new paper on the provenance of the EB ground stone tools from Tell es-Safi/Gath has appeared. The paper, which was spearheaded by Jeremy Beller is entitled:
Beller, J. A., Greenfield, H. J., Fayek, M., Shai, I., and Maeir, A. M.
2019 Raw Material Variety and Acquisition of the EB III Ground Stone Assemblage of Tell es-Safi/Gath (Israel). Pp. 121–50 in Stone Tools in the Ancient
Near East and Egypt: Ground Stone Tools, Rock-Cut Installations and Stone Vessels from the Prehistory to Late Antiquity, eds. A. Squitieri and D. Eitam. Oxford: Archaeopress.
See a link to a PDF here.
Check it out!
Life’s Little Rituals
I suppose that it is unsurprising that archaeologists have rituals since we study so many. One of my favourites is the first return to the site, retracing the well-beaten paths of previous years to sites which greet you like an old friend. Here I am! I’m the first wall that you drew; I’m the tiny patch of shade that gave you refuge; I’m the marker peg you fell over! I’m back in my palace. Well, it’s Amenhotep III’s palace really, and I hope that he’d be pleased with what we’ve done with it. We’ll be missing our lovely brick conservator, Tony Crosby, this season so there won’t be the same pressure to complete wall drawings so that his team can cap the walls, and we just may build up enough of a reservoir of drawings to put us ahead of the game next season.
With two new team members, Ivor and Danielle, we did a broader familiarisation tour of the site. It always gives me a kick to see the extent of the infrastructure necessary just for the king to celebrate his heb-sed festival, and how poor the accommodation was for his servants. There is a definite sense of the temporary nature of the structures not quite so apparent in the king’s apartments!
Our walk continued to the ‘industrial area’, all the evidence is there except the area itself which may either have been lost during the clearances of the royal viewing pavilion by the 1907 Met team, or may still to be found… Of course, the kilns could be under the spoil-heaps – that’s an archaeological truism – there’s always something good under the spoil heap. One of this season’s objectives is to excavate part of the spoil heaps to understand more about the industrial processes and the relationship between the different crafts. Just in a few square metres we find evidence for faience and glass manufacture, and carnelian working in huge quantities, pieces of worked pink granite – perhaps fragments of statuary. If we excavate a new square towards the West Settlement area where Janice is working we may discover if there is any relationship between the two areas, and perhaps that elusive industrial base.
The viewing pavilion, ramped on three sides, is still impressive with its niche and buttress façade, faced by a huge open court on its fourth ‘flat’ side. I wonder how many people stood in the courtyard staring in awe at the king sitting in splendour? Hundreds, or thousands? The heb-sed was the ritual that celebrated the renewal of kingship on which hung the prosperity of the land and its people, and the king’s relationship with the gods. Not an event to be taken lightly!
We then walked to the Amun Temple with its huge sun courts that anticipate the better known courts at Amarna. The temple is in a sad state of decayed splendour. Although it would repay re-excavation the early excavators had to deal with a relatively unknown phenomenon – a mud-brick temple – and in trying to understand the structure in some places they cleared the casemate support walls down to their foundations and made understanding the structures that stood on the casemates a difficult prospect. The conservation and reconstruction work necessary here would be a huge burden to whoever took on the project. However, it would be immensely rewarding to reinterpret this Amun temple in the light of what we now know about the Amarna sun cult.
We worked our way back to our main site tracing the line of the raised royal road, now washed out by a wadi and vanishing under the monastery. I had no chance to explore in that direction last year and I don’t suppose there will be time this year, either. Arriving back at the West Settlement and industrial area we set up our first squares so that we can start work first thing on Saturday.
Welcome in Egypt! Welcome in Malqata! It’s so good to be back.
Diana Craig Patch, Janice Kamrin, Jan Picton, Ivor Pridden
We are very happy to announce our arrival back “home” on the West Bank. Our respective planes landed at the Luxor airport late on Monday night, and we spent most of Tuesday visiting the East Bank Taftish and our friend Ray Johnson at Chicago House, and organizing supplies back at our hotel. In the late afternoon, we decided to take a walk to reintroduce this season’s photographer, Ivor (also known as Jan’s husband) to the local landscape, which has changed a lot in the fifteen years since he was last here. We walked up past the Colossi of Memnon at Kom el-Hettan, then down the Qurna road to the Ramesseum. To start out our blog for the 2019 season, we thought we’d share some of the photos we took along the way.
*We want to express our sorrow at the loss of Hourig’s beloved husband and our great colleague, Rainer Stadelmann.
Interested in digging this summer at Tell es-Safi/Gath and need some financial assistance?
Perhaps look into the travel grants from the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society!
The Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society
ANNUAL TRAVEL GRANTS 2019
The following grants are offered to UK students of archaeology and
related subjects, for excavation or relevant research in Israel:
The Nicholas Slope Memorial Award, and a small number of further
grants, each normally up to £500
Application forms can be downloaded from: www.aias.org.uk, where you
will also find more information.
Or else, write to: Administrator, Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society,
2nd Floor, Supreme House, 300 Regents Park Road, London N3 2JX
Queries: email email@example.com
Applications and references must be received by Wednesday 20th March 2019.
The AIAS is non-political and embraces all religions and ethnic groups.
Please visit us on Facebook www.facebook.com/IsraelArchaeologyLondon
HT: Jack Sasson
Dr. Brent Davis (Melbourne) is a long time core-team member of the Safi project. In addition to his interest in the Philistines, Brent is one of the leading experts in the world on Bronze Age Aegean scripts and languages.
Among his various works, he has published a book on stone vessels with inscriptions in Linear A (see here, and previously noted here), has questioned whether Cypro-Minoan script was used in Iron Age Philistia (see here), and has several joint articles on Philistine writing and language (here and here).
Now, he has put out what I believe is a brilliant article in which, based on a close statistical analysis, shows that the while both the Phaistos Disc and Linear A are undeciphered writing systems, he can demonstrate that the both are, with a high degree of certainty, encode the same language!
The 2017 team at Tell es-Safi/Gath had an opportunity to hear about his research in a lecture he gave during the 2017 season. In addition, he presented this paper at the AIA annual meeting in San Diego earlier this month (January 2019), and also for PASP = Program in Aegean Scripts and Prehistory at the University of Texas at Austin (in mid-Jan. 2019), where it was received very favourably.
For us “Philistines,” such studies are of interest and importance, as they shed light on issues that may help us understand aspects of language, literacy and related topics in Iron Age Philistia.
The full title of the article is:
Davis, B. 2018. The Phaistos Disk: A New Way of Viewing the Language Behind the Script. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 37(4): 373–410.
Check it out! Way to go Brent!
A new paper on the Philistines in the Iron I has just appeared.
The full details are:
Maeir, A. M. 2018. Iron Age I Philistines: Entangled Identities in a Transformative Period. Pp. 310–23 in The Social Archaeology of the Levant: From Prehistory to the Present, eds. A. Yasur-Landau, E. H. Cline and E. Rowan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Go here for a PDF.
Now is the time to sign up for the 2019 season at Tell es-Safi/Gath! The online registration is up and running, and the finds in the 2019 season are going to be great. We will be working in various areas in the lower city (both already open and new areas) with lots of interesting finds – mainly from the Iron Age (Philistine Gath).
And for all those planning to join us – don’t forget to sign up for the MOOC on biblical archaeology – which serves as an excellent introduction to what we are doing at the site!
Registration continues until May 1st, 2019
Be there – or be square!
And to get a feeling of what you will find (or, what you will miss…), here are pictures from the 2018 season!
Check out this fascinating interview with Prof. Ian Hodder (Standford) on the interface between religion and material culture (see his book “Studies in the Human-Thing Entanglement“), part of the HAS (Homo Ars Project): Material Culture and Religion, created in collaboration with the OLLE/Mediterraneo Antico Foundation, directed by Dr. Nicola Laneri.
Well worth listening to this interview (and doing some follow up reading) for those interested in the archaeological and anthropological aspects of religion!
HT Nicola Laneri
Today, I received in the mail a couple of new books. They both look very interesting!
I love getting books…:-)
As mentioned previously, the online course (MOOC) on Biblical Archaeology is going very well, and as of yesterday, 2100 participants have registered for the course!
Now we have some nice news about this. The entire course is in English, but to enable those interested in the course who don’t know enough English to follow it, there are now captions for the videos in the Hebrew, Portuguese (so far from the videos in Lesson 1, but more to follow), and I hope very soon in Spanish as well!
So, if any friends, family, colleagues or students are interested, and this will make it possible for them to follow the course – do them to register!
And if anyone (preferably with a background in biblical archaeology so as to know the relevant terms) is interested in volunteering to try and translate the video captions into other languages, do get in touch with me!
And BTW – just to get you and others more interested, in the lesson that will go online this coming Wednesday (January 23, 2019), in addition to some very interesting aspects of Israelite and Judahite culture and daily life, we will have a video on making biblical period food (and accompanying recipes to that participants can try them out on their own!). This was a lot of fun!
P.S. And thanks to Jorge Fabbro for the Portuguese translation!
Today, I participated in the 15th Annual Joint Conference of the IAA Southern District and the Dept. of Bible, Archaeology and Ancient Near East of BGU, which dealt with various issues relating to cult and burial.
I have a paper on cult and burial at Philistine Gath, discussing various finds at Tell es-Safi/Gath and what they say about the Philistine culture in general.
Most of the papers presented in the conference were published in the proceedings that were available at the meeting, which, in addition to my paper (which was published in Hebrew, as the paper that was presented), also included an important paper by Gunnar Lehmann and colleagues (this was in English), on the Iron I/IIA “200 Cemetery” at Tell el-Farah (South), which is also an important cemetery in Iron Age Philistia, with, among other finds, several cremation burials.
The titles of these two papers are:
Maeir, A. M. 2019 Burial and Worship in Tel Tzafit/Gath in the Early Iron Age: Evidence for the Diverse Sources of the Philistine Culture (In Hebrew). Pp. 99–112 in Worship and Burial in the Shfela and Negev Regions Throughout the Ages. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Southern Conference, eds. D. Varga, Y. Abadi-Reiss, G. Lehmann and D. Vainstub. Beersheba: Israel Antiquities Authority and Ben-Gurion University. (see here for PDF)
Lehmann, G., Golding-Meir, R., Sparks, R. T., and Neumeier-Potashnik, B.
2019 Tell el-Far’ah (South) Cemetery 200 Revisited. Pp. 4*-18* in Worship and Burial in the Shfela and Negev Regions Throughout the Ages. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Southern Conference, eds. D. Varga, Y. Abadi-Reiss, G. Lehmann and D. Vainstub. Beersheba: Israel Antiquities Authority and Ben-Gurion University.
Now here is something cool! Itamar Berko, who is an MA student in the Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology at BIU, will be utilizing the handheld LIDAR scanner (Geoslam Zeb-Revo) that we recently purchased (joint ISF equipment grant to Boaz Zissu, Rafi Kent and Aren Maeir) for field research in caves.
For practice, he did a quick, walk-around scan of the Safi lab.
Go to this very cool 3D model that he produced. Don’t be scared of the blog of dots! Check it out and “go inside” – and you’ll be able to see actual details of the rooms and even furniture in the lab. And take into account that this was done very quickly, with a relatively look resolution. Cool!
Imagine how effective this would be to walk into a dark cave, and be able to collected data in a short time that would enable to produce an accurate 3D model of the cave. Much simpler than standard measuring methods!
Angela HusterStone tools for grinding corn – manos and metates – are a fundamental hallmark of Mesoamerican culture. Prior to the introduction of modern electric mills, Mexican women would spend several hours every day grinding corn with a mano and metate. A mano and metate were traditional wedding gifts, because they were so fundamental to setting up your own household. At Calixtlahuaca, they are one more line of evidence for how the site is subtly different from many contemporaneous Aztec sites.
A woman instructing her daughter how to grind corn in Codex MendozaIn Central Mexico, grinding stones go through two major changes. First, early in Mesoamerican prehistory, there is a change from mostly basin metates (with walls around the edges) and smaller handstones, to mostly flat metates with longer handstones. Archaeologists generally assume that this change is related to a shift toward grinding pre-soaked corn (a soft food that doesn’t bounce around when it’s being ground), rather than small, hard seeds or dry corn. In the US Southwest, the introduction of corn produces the opposite pattern in metate forms, because people there grind their corn dry (Adams 1999). There is a second change in grinding stone tools in the Postclassic, when metates with legs and thin manos with handles on the ends become more common. These changes would have made fine-grinding corn more efficient, perhaps as a way to reduce the fuel needed for cooking or to make it easier to digest (Biskowski 2000).
Mano fragments from CalixtlahuacaAt Calixtlahuaca, this second change didn’t really happen. We get some metates with legs, but they aren’t the only type in use. More noticeably, the shift from “Classic style” relatively thick manos without distinct handle grips on the ends, to thinner “Aztec style” manos with handle grips is missing. When I classified the ground stone from the site, I planned on using the same coding categories from Mike’s previous projects in Morelos. This classification basically has five categories for manos, ranging from one for a thick mano without differentiated handles, to five for a thin mano with pronounced handles. At sites in Morelos, most manos are 4s or 5s on this scale. At Calixtlahuaca, there were only a couple of cases that even scored as 3s; most were 1s or 2s.
Ways of classifying the shapes of manosThis “conservatism” in grinding technology fits into two larger patterns at Calixtlahuaca. First, it is likely related to differences in how maize was eaten in the Toluca Valley, relative to many other parts of Central Mexico (see previous posts on maize cooking HERE). If people at Calixtlahuaca didn’t eat as many tortillas (which require finer-than-average grinding), they may not have needed the increased efficiency provided by handled manos. Second, the continued use of an older style of grinding stones is part of a broader set of traits that people in the Toluca Valley maintained long after their neighbors in the Basin of Mexico, including the use of red-on-natural pottery, particular styles of censers, and lots of obsidian from the Ucareo source.Works Cited:Adams, Jenny L.1999 Refocusing the Role of Food-Grinding Tools as Correlates for Subsistence Strategies in the U.S. Southwest. American Antiquity 64(3):475-498.Biskowski, Martin2000 Maize Preparation and the Aztec Subsistence Economy. Ancient Mesoamerica 11:293-306.
A new paper has just appeared, in which I discuss and question the age-old image of the Philistines as a warlike and fearsome culture and people. Based on the relatively small amount of weapons found in Iron Age Philistia, I suggest that perhaps a big part of this image is due to ancient, and modern, ideological perspectives.
The title of article is:
Maeir, A. M. 2018. The Philistines Be Upon Thee, Samson (Jud. 16:20): Reassessing the Martial Nature of the Philistines – Archaeological Evidence Vs. Ideological Image? Pp. 158–68 in Change, Continuity and Connectivity: North-Eastern Mediterranean at the Turn of the Bronze Age and in the Early Iron Age, eds. L. Niesiołowski-Spanò and M. Węcowski. Philippika 118. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
For a link to a PDF – go here.
John Stringer, who was a team member in 2018, is organizing a group of Kiwis (that is New Zealanders…) that will come as a group to the 2019 season at Tell es-Safi/Gath.
John has already made a very nice patch for the team (see below)!
If you want to join Team Kiwi 2019 – be in touch with John at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Kia Ora (that’s “be well” in Maori…)!
Two weeks ago, I participated in a very interesting seminar at Tel Aviv University, where Prof. Shlomo Bunimovitz and myself debated the understanding and origins of the early Philistines. Shlomo claimed that the early Philistine originated from a distinct region in the Aegean (most probably the eastern Aegean), and only after the initial phase, did the Philistine culture begin the show mixed cultural influences.
On the other hand, I argued, as I’ve written often, that the Philistines did not originate from one region, but rather, the originate from various regions to the west of the Levant, and from the very early phase of the Philistine culture, it was mixed, entangled culture.
The debate was in Hebrew, and for those interested, a recording can be found here.
Are you (or anyone you know) interested in a month-long, fully accredited, academic program in Israel, this coming summer (June/July 2019), which is partially subsidized, in which you will study about the history of Israel from early to modern times, and as part of the course there are two weeks of excavation at Tell es-Safi/Gath?
If so – check out the program “ISRAEL: FROM THE PAST TO THE PRESENT” – through BIU and Onward Israel!
Apply now – there are limited places!
Don’t miss this opportunity!
And of course – don’t forget to sign up for the MOOC on Biblical Archaeology!
ASOR has just announced its scholarships and fellowships for the 2019 excavation year. These are great sources for funding if you are looking to excavate this summer.
And don’t forget – you can easily register for this summer’s excavation season at Tel Burna here.
I’m about to give a paper at a very interesting conference at the Weizmann Institute of Science – Genealogy and the Sciences, held yesterday and today (17-18/12/18)
In my paper “Genealogy Through Material Culture? Some Thoughts Based on the Archaeological Evidence from Iron Age Philistia”, I will use the archaeological evidence on the Philistine culture as a case study to see whether archaeological evidence can be used for genealogical research.
Just a reminder that tomorrow, Wednesday, Dec. 19th, 2018, a workshop on votive objects from Iron Age Israel and and Aram will be held, as part of ongoing activities of the Minerva Center for the Relations between Israel and Aram in Biblical Times (RIAB).
The workshop will be held at the laboratory of the Tell es-Safi/Gath Archaeological Project, in the building of the Faculty of Jewish Studies, at Bar-Ilan University.
See here for further details. Do join us if you can!
Very sad news that Rona Ramon has passed away. Rona was the wife of the Israeli astronaut, Ilan Ramon z”l, who was killed in the Columbia Shuttle disaster. Rona was a fantastic and utterly inspiring person, and I feel so honored that I had an opportunity to meet her a few years ago.
May her memory be blessed…
Why go on an archaeological excavation if you’re not an Archaeology major?Over the course of ten season we have had a variety of undergraduate majors join our archaeological excavation. Many come after taking an archaeology course with one of our staff members or friends of the project, having experienced archaeology in the classroom or having seen Indiana Jones perhaps a few too many times. Some of these students have already declared a major or minor in Archaeology, Classics, Art History, or some variation of these fields that clearly relate to the excavation of the Ancient World. Excavation is an obvious choice for these students, but we have also had pre-med students, business majors, engineers, and studio artists. Other than the experience, which we think is well worth it, what skills can non-majors gain from working at Gabii?
Area G/H works together to fill out one of their first context sheets.An archaeological excavation is no small undertaking. Students are assigned to one of our excavation areas and work in groups of five to fifteen other students, supervised by professors and graduate students. For some this is not their first time excavating, some not even their first time at Gabii, they know some of what to expect and can handle the demanding environment. For others the changes of living in a new place and performing physical work in hot conditions takes some adjustment. As these new experiences are occurring you develop a strong sense of community and comradery with your trench mates. While we could assign each person their own small area to excavate, the process moves much faster when working together. In large deposits students team up: one pickaxes, one shovels, and another sorts through the finds in a wheelbarrow. Although people quickly develop preferences for what they enjoy most and what they excel in, a huge part of teamwork is equitable division of labor and we want to make sure that everyone can truly experience each of these elements of fieldwork.Similarly, the physical excavation is only a part of what occurs on an archaeological site. Throughout the season students are rotated through our finds, topography, botany, and zoology teams. In these specialized units they can see the post processing work that provides crucial information like dates, information on the ancient diet, and how we record everything that we have done. We strive to build understanding and foster respect for all the different tasks that occur in the field. As a part of this rotation, students learn how to effectively and succinctly communicate. All of the recording that is done in the field, primarily by students with their supervisor’s assistance, is available through our open source database. Students learn how to describe archaeological features, different soil textures, and the fine distinction between salmon and terracotta to name a few examples.
Part of the environmental rotation includes finding and
identifying different types of ancient seeds.Throughout the course of the summer students are taught to pay attention to detail and to think critically about large scale processes that happened over the past three thousand year at the site of Gabii. From the very start volunteers take an active role in completing paperwork, beginning with learning how to describe what they see in archaeological terms, and ending in producing interpretations of the archaeology that become a part of Gabii record in our database and, eventually, our publications. In order to understand how ancient Gabines lived, we have to understand how different layers were deposited and what those different actions indicate.
Every new corner of Rome holds
unexpected, beautiful surprises.Gabii is fortunately positioned to appeal to student’s sense of adventure. While excavating at Gabii, our students live in the eternal city itself, Rome. They call Trastevere, a vibrant neighborhood of Rome that is full of restaurants and shops, home for the five weeks of excavation. Trastevere is not the well-kept secret of Rome that it once was, but that does not detract from the area’s charm and has only improved public transit, making it easier for our students to get out and explore Rome and Italy on the weekends. For those who want to travel further afield, there is easy access to Rome’s train stations. Every year we have students who go to classics like Naples/Pompeii and Florence. Other great weekend getaways include Bologna, Ravenna, any Italian beach, and the hill towns of Tuscany (like Cortona, San Gimigiano, and Siena). Students interested in food, art, culture, history all find something to enjoy in Italy.Our alumni have gone on to work in a number of different fields (not just academia): for example, law, marketing, journalism, museum work, engineering, medicine, and social media. The critical thinking, communication, and teamwork skills developed while on excavation translate into any field or career path and the friendships built at Gabii carry on even after the summer ends. If you are considering what to do for this upcoming summer, consider joining the field team at Gabii, we look forward to meeting you.
In case you were wondering what the view in San Marino is like.
I have a feeling this may be a stop on more lists for the 2019 summer.To learn more about the Gabii Project and to apply to join our 2019 field season, click here.
We are very sad to hear of the passing of Jay Rosenberg’s father. May his memory be a blessing.
Jay Rosenberg has been with the project since the beginning and most of the staff have known him for many years from our time together at Tell es-Safi.
The BAR “Dig Issue” is out and Rebecca Zami, Safi team member in the 2017 and 2018 seasons, and a student of Jill Katz from YU, is the star!
Rebecca appears on the cover of the issue! In addition, as one of those who received a scholarship from the BAS, she wrote a very nice essay about her experiences at Safi (go here and scroll down to her essay).
Check it out!
Way to go Rebecca!
This afternoon, just after the MOOC went online, I drove to Tell es-Safi/Gath, to meet Prof. Elisabetta Boaretto (WIS) and Dr. Michael Toffolo (Université Bordeaux-Montaigne), to do some microarchaeological sampling, from a very interesting context in Area F. This is in a square, right inside the EB and MB fortifications, which had been excavated previously under the supervision of Prof. Jeff Chadwick (BYU).
We had already done some sampling in this area before (see here), but due to the very interesting results – and many more questions – we decided to return for another round of sampling (and maybe more will be required).
While I can’t tell a lot of what we found, as the research is still ongoing, there are some very interesting concentrations of phytoliths, ash, burned materials and brick detritus, located in the sediment layers of the latest EB and early MB contexts in this area.
See here some pictures that I took of the work. And since it is already after the first rains – everything around the tell was very, very green!
So, the MOOC is up and running, with great registration (as of this morning, just under 700 students), from countries from all over the world, including a few that don’t have diplomatic relations with Israel…:-)
A nice article on the course was just published on YNET, in Hebrew – check it out!
And for those who have not signed up – now is the time – and do it here!
The Frank Moore Cross Award. This award is presented to the editor/author of the most substantial volume(s) related to one of the following categories: a) the history and/or religion of ancient Israel; b) ancient Near Eastern and eastern Mediterranean epigraphy; c) textual studies on the Hebrew Bible; or d) comparative studies of the Hebrew Bible and ancient Near Eastern literature. This work must be the result of original research published during the past two years. (One award is given annually.) Awarded to Matthew J. Suriano , Associate Professor of Jewish Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, for A History of Death in the Hebrew Bible.
Check out this 3D model of the excavation areas at Tel Burna following the 2018 season. Thanks to Bruno Soltic for the photographing the site with the Tandy drone.
The MOOC on Biblical Archaeology opens in two more days, on Wednesday, December 5th, 2018!For those who already registered (as of yesterday, some 500 people are already registered), last night the first “brainteaser” was sent out!If you want to join in on the fun – and learning – sign up for the course!
The annual list of excavations has been published by BAR, and as usual, for the last quarter century or so, the upcoming season at Tell es-Safi/Gath appears!
Be there or be square!
And, if already, here’s a reminder about the MOOC on Biblical Archaeology that opens next week, on Wednesday, December 5th, 2018.
Join the hundreds who have already registered for the course! To register, go here.
The Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) in biblical archaeology, that I’ve mentioned previously (registration is open – go here), is about to start! The first lesson will go online next week, on Wednesday, December 5th, 2018. Following that, each week (save for a two week break at the end of December for the holidays), a new lesson will go online – a total of 8 lessons.
Yesterday, as part of the final work on the various lessons, we filmed at the Weizmann Institute in Rehovot (WIS). There, we interviewed Prof. Stephen (Steve) Weiner and Prof. Elisabetta (Lisa) Boaretto, leading figures in the application of the exact sciences in archaeology.
As part of the course is not only to teach about Biblical Archaeology, but to give a general background on archaeology in general, and how it is practices – from field to lab – an important aspect is the inter- and multi-disciplinary research that is conducted in archaeology.
So, no better place than to do this at WIS, and to discussion with Steve and Lisa about various scientific applications in archaeology. More so, the stressed the integration of the two into what they call “Microarchaeology“.
As you can see in the pictures below, and as will appear on the MOOC, I interviewed Steve and Lisa in their labs, on such issues as the use of the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) in archaeology, and how, with a step-by-step demonstration (and I even participated in this, not that proficiently, as you can see in the photos), Carbon 14 dating is conducted in the WIS facilities.
So don’t wait – sign up for the MOOC – it’s going to be very interesting!
See here some great pictures from this day:
See the write-up here.
“The site of Tel Burna is located in the Shephelah region, which served as a border between the kingdoms of Judah and Philistia in the Iron Age. A fertile area that supported agricultural production, the region became known as the breadbasket of the south and is believed by some scholars to be a candidate for Biblical Libnah, a Canaanite town that was conquered by Joshua who allotted it to the tribe of Judah.”
A new article (see here), a joint effort of several colleagues, which deals with the 14C chronology of the transition between the LB and Iron Age at Tell es-Safi/Gath, Qubur el-Walaydah and Megiddo, has just been published.In this study, we argue that the the transition between the LB and Iron Age age commenced earlier than usually assumed (already in the 13th cent. BCE). In addition, we suggest that: a) it was a protracted process; b) it probably commenced earlier in southern than in northern Canaan; c) a methodological framework for comparing chronologies between sites over a relatively large region.The article is a response to Israel Finkelstein’s response on an earlier article of ours – who has recently even published a second response…:-)The full title is:Boaretto, E., Asscher, Y., Hitchcock, L. A., Lehmann, G., Maeir, A. M., and Weiner, S. 2018. The Chronology of the Late Bronze (LB)-Iron Age (IA) Transition in the Southern Levant: A Response to Israel Finkelstein’s Paper. Radiocarbon. DOI:10.1017/RDC.2018.57I do hope you will find this of interest – and that it will generate continuing discussion and debate! And I’m sure – not all will agree with our views! :-)Aren
The annual meeting of the American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) was held in Denver on Nov. 14-17, 2018.
As in previous years, there was quite a lot of Safi related things going on at the meeting, including various presentations, posters, and special session in honor of the Festschrift for Aren’s 60th birthday, and an event in which, among other things, the P. E. MacAllister Field Archaeology Award, for outstanding contributions to ancient Near Eastern and Eastern Mediterranean archaeology, was given to Aren. Some of Safi crew got together for a very nice supper, and in addition, Jeff, Aren and Amanda popped over to visit the Colorado Christian University campus, and were hosted by Dr. David Kotter, Dr. Seth Rodriquez, Dr. and Mrs. Usrey, Melissa Johnson and Josephine Geisler
The following Safi related presentations were given:
Aren presented an update on the 2018 season of excavations at Safi – “The 2018 Excavations at Tell es-Safi/Gath: Overview of the Results.”
Debi Cassuto presented two papers – one on the connection between cult and weaving at Safi (“Tying Up Loose Ends: Weaving and Cult in the Southern Levant”), and one, jointly with Margaret Cohen, on the connection between cult and weaving at Safi and Megiddo.
Andy Creekmore gave a paper on the magnetometric remote sensing at Tell es-Safi/Gath, and how it helped identify sub-surface features – some of them then excavated in the 2018 season – “A Magnetometry Study of the Philistine City of Gath”.
Liz Arnold et al. gave a great paper on isotopic analyses of additional sacrificial donkeys from the EB levels at Safi – showing that 4 donkeys were imported from Egypt – “Isotopic Analyses of Donkey Burials under the EB III House Floors in the Early Bronze Age City of Tell es-Safi”.
Haskel Greenfield et al. gave a talk on household archaeology in the EB levels at Tell es-Safi/Gath – “Houses and Households in the Early Bronze Age of the Southern Levant: Recent Research at Tell es-Safi/Gath”.
Eric Welch gave an interesting talk about the ideology behind Bliss and Macalister’s reporting at Tell es-Safi/Gath – “Ignorance is Bliss or Was Bliss Ignorant? Contextualizing the Culturally Biased Conclusions of the 1899 Palestine Exploration Fund Expedition to Tell es-Safi.”
Will Krieger gave a talk: “The Evolution of Theory and Methods in Philistine Archaeology,” comparing the work at Miqne-Ekron and Tell es-Safi/Gath.
Maddi Harris-Schober gave a talk on cultic architecture in the Levant, with a focus on finds from Safi – “They Practice Divination Like the Philistines! A Re-Analysis of Cultic and Ritual Architecture of the Southern Levant.”
The following posters were presented:
Jeremy Beller et al. presented “Stones in Homes: The Spatial Distribution and Use of Ground Stone Objects at EB III Tell es-Safi/Gath, Israel”
Annie Brown et al. presented “Spatial Representation of Heavy Fraction Collection and Analysis from Tell esSafi/Gath, Israel”
Tiffany Okaluk et al. presented “Urban vs. Rural Butchery Practices in the Early Bronze Age: A Comparison of Butchering Technology between Tell es-Safi/Gath, Israel, and Göltepe, Turkey”
Sarah Richardson et al. presented “Who? What? Where? Understanding the Population, Their Household Organization, and Activities through Bone Tool Use at Tell es-Safi/Gath, Israel”
Here are some pictures of the various events, lectures and activities! It was really great seeing all the Safi team! And if I may add, it was nice to see former Safiites who moved on to conduct research at other sites as well!
Check out Bruno’s excellent video (with narration by Eric Cline) that he filmed, produced, wrote, etc. related to the 2018 season at Tel Burna for this year’s ASOR conference. Well done Bruno! You can also subscribe to his channel here. As we are hoping that Bruno will continue to add more to his growing “assemblage” of films – we have a new tab for videos related to the site.
As previously noted, a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) by Aren entitled: “Biblical Archaeology: The Archaeology of Ancient Israel and Judah” is about to go online thru the EdX platform. The course is planned to start on December 5th, 2018.
As of this week, the registration for the course has opened! So those interested in taking this course (for free if one audits it), you can register for the course right now! Here is the link.
Try it out!
Thanks to the editors – who worked very hard on this, and to all the contributors, for putting together this beautiful volume – the festschrift in honor of my 60th birthday!
Check out the TOC – very impressive!!! WOW :-)